Discussion:
The physics of your idiot guru still inconsistent
(too old to reply)
Maciej Wozniak
2024-08-07 10:57:08 UTC
Permalink
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
As seen, the definition of second loved so
much to be invoked by relativistic morons -
wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.


Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt
solar system is measuring the length
of solar day. What is the result predicted
by the Einsteinian physics?
One prediction is - 99766. From the
postulates. The second prediction is -
86400. From definition.
And similiarly with the prediction of
a measurement of a meridian.


Thank you for your attention, poor
relativistic fanatics, have a nice day.
Python
2024-08-07 11:26:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Maciej Wozniak
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
As seen, the definition of second loved so
much to be invoked by relativistic [physicists] -
wasn't valid in the time when [Albert Einstein]
lived and [published]. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt
solar system is measuring the length
of solar day. What is the result predicted
by the Einsteinian physics?
One prediction is - 99766. From the
postulates. The second prediction is -
86400. From definition.
If the observer brings his own co-moving copy of the Solar System he
will notice that the rotation time of his own copy of Earth won't match
the rotation time of the original Earth.
Post by Maciej Wozniak
And [similarly] with the prediction of
a measurement of a meridian.
Same. He will notice that the length of a meridian won't change on his
own copy of Earth while it will be shorter on the original Earth.

Case closed: SR is consistent.
Maciej Wozniak
2024-08-07 12:18:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Python
Post by Maciej Wozniak
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
As seen, the definition of second loved so
much to be invoked by relativistic [physicists] -
wasn't valid in the time when [Albert Einstein]
lived and [published]. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt
solar system is measuring the length
of solar day. What is the result predicted
by the Einsteinian physics?
One prediction is - 99766. From the
postulates. The second prediction is -
86400. From definition.
If the observer brings his own co-moving copy of the Solar System he
Physicists of 1905 were idiots, sure,
but not in your scale and their definition
does not include your delusional madness.
It is simple 1/86400 of a [solar] day -
making the mumble of your idiot guru
not even consistent.
Similarly (thanks for correction) with
the meridian. Sorry, poor stinker.
Python
2024-08-07 12:29:58 UTC
Permalink
[stupid babbling]
Similarly (thanks for correction)
You're welcome.
[profanity]
Maciej Wozniak
2024-08-07 12:37:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Python
[stupid babbling]
Similarly (thanks for correction)
You're welcome.
[profanity]
And the physics of your idiot guru remains
not even consistent; a piece of fanatic
shit babbling of gedanken copies of Solar
System (sic) is not changing anything.
Python
2024-08-07 12:51:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Python
[stupid babbling]
Similarly (thanks for correction)
You're welcome.
[profanity]
And the physics of [SR] remains
not even consistent; a [snip profanity]
[snip profanity] gedanken copies  of Solar
System  (sic) is not changing  anything.
It is. Every layman could understand it, even if some
"laymen" won't.
Maciej Wozniak
2024-08-07 12:59:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Python
Post by Python
[stupid babbling]
Similarly (thanks for correction)
You're welcome.
[profanity]
And the physics of [SR] remains
not even consistent; a [snip profanity]
[snip profanity] gedanken copies  of Solar
System  (sic) is not changing  anything.
It is.
No, it is not. Physicists of 1905 were
VERY stupid, sure, but not stupid enough
to invoke gedanken copies of Earth in their
definition of a physical measurement unit.
Their definitions of second and meter were
what they were was and The Shit of your
idiot guru was not even consistent.


And whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit
to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid
would be, and he has written it clearly
enough for anyone able to read (even if not
clearly enough for you, poor stinker).
Python
2024-08-07 13:04:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Maciej Wozniak
Post by Python
Post by Python
[stupid babbling]
Similarly (thanks for correction)
You're welcome.
[profanity]
And the physics of [SR] remains
not even consistent; a [snip profanity]
[snip profanity] gedanken copies  of Solar
System  (sic) is not changing  anything.
It is.
No, it is not. Physicists of 1905 were
VERY stupid, sure, but not stupid enough
to invoke gedanken copies of Earth in their
definition of a physical measurement unit.
Their definitions of second and meter were
what they were was and The Shit of your
idiot guru was not even consistent.
And whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit
to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid
would be, and he has written it clearly
enough for anyone able to read (even if not
clearly enough for you, poor stinker).
Yawn.
Maciej Wozniak
2024-08-07 13:06:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Maciej Wozniak
Post by Python
Post by Python
[stupid babbling]
Similarly (thanks for correction)
You're welcome.
[profanity]
And the physics of [SR] remains
not even consistent; a [snip profanity]
[snip profanity] gedanken copies  of Solar
System  (sic) is not changing  anything.
It is.
No, it is not. Physicists of 1905 were
VERY stupid, sure, but not stupid enough
to invoke gedanken copies of Earth in their
definition of a physical measurement unit.
Their definitions of second and meter were
what they were was and The Shit of your
idiot guru was not even consistent.
And whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit
to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid
would be, and he has written it clearly
enough for anyone able to read (even if not
clearly enough for you, poor stinker).
Yawn.
Your yawning changes nothing, samely as
your moronic gedanken copies of Earth.
The Shit of your idiot guru remains
not even consistent.
Python
2024-08-07 13:09:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Maciej Wozniak
Post by Maciej Wozniak
Post by Python
Post by Python
[stupid babbling]
Similarly (thanks for correction)
You're welcome.
[profanity]
And the physics of [SR] remains
not even consistent; a [snip profanity]
[snip profanity] gedanken copies  of Solar
System  (sic) is not changing  anything.
It is.
No, it is not. Physicists of 1905 were
VERY stupid, sure, but not stupid enough
to invoke gedanken copies of Earth in their
definition of a physical measurement unit.
Their definitions of second and meter were
what they were was and The Shit of your
idiot guru was not even consistent.
And whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit
to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid
would be, and he has written it clearly
enough for anyone able to read (even if not
clearly enough for you, poor stinker).
Yawn.
Your yawning changes nothing, samely as
your moronic gedanken copies of Earth.
The Shit of your idiot guru remains
not even consistent.
Yawn. Yawn.

The case is closed. Posting demented rant on demented rant
won't change anything :-) You've still not convince a single
person on Earth that your are right. Not even other cranks :-)
Maciej Wozniak
2024-08-07 13:52:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Python
Post by Maciej Wozniak
Post by Maciej Wozniak
Post by Python
Post by Python
[stupid babbling]
Similarly (thanks for correction)
You're welcome.
[profanity]
And the physics of [SR] remains
not even consistent; a [snip profanity]
[snip profanity] gedanken copies  of Solar
System  (sic) is not changing  anything.
It is.
No, it is not. Physicists of 1905 were
VERY stupid, sure, but not stupid enough
to invoke gedanken copies of Earth in their
definition of a physical measurement unit.
Their definitions of second and meter were
what they were was and The Shit of your
idiot guru was not even consistent.
And whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit
to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid
would be, and he has written it clearly
enough for anyone able to read (even if not
clearly enough for you, poor stinker).
Yawn.
Your yawning changes nothing, samely as
your moronic gedanken copies of Earth.
The Shit of your idiot guru remains
not even consistent.
Yawn. Yawn.
The case is closed.
Yes it is, I've proven the mumble
of your idiot guru to be not even
consistent. A fanatic piece of shit
screaming "NOOOOO!!" and trying to
fake the definitions it was using
is changing nothing.
Python
2024-08-07 13:53:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Maciej Wozniak
Post by Python
Post by Maciej Wozniak
Post by Maciej Wozniak
Post by Python
Post by Python
[stupid babbling]
Similarly (thanks for correction)
You're welcome.
[profanity]
And the physics of [SR] remains
not even consistent; a [snip profanity]
[snip profanity] gedanken copies  of Solar
System  (sic) is not changing  anything.
It is.
No, it is not. Physicists of 1905 were
VERY stupid, sure, but not stupid enough
to invoke gedanken copies of Earth in their
definition of a physical measurement unit.
Their definitions of second and meter were
what they were was and The Shit of your
idiot guru was not even consistent.
And whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit
to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid
would be, and he has written it clearly
enough for anyone able to read (even if not
clearly enough for you, poor stinker).
Yawn.
Your yawning changes nothing, samely as
your moronic gedanken copies of Earth.
The Shit of your idiot guru remains
not even consistent.
Yawn. Yawn.
The case is closed.
Yes it is, I've proven the mumble
of your idiot guru to be not even
consistent. A fanatic piece of shit
screaming "NOOOOO!!" and trying to
fake the definitions it was using
is changing nothing.
*Yawn*

J. J. Lodder
2024-08-07 12:47:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Python
Post by Maciej Wozniak
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
As seen, the definition of second loved so
much to be invoked by relativistic [physicists] -
wasn't valid in the time when [Albert Einstein]
lived and [published]. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt
solar system is measuring the length
of solar day. What is the result predicted
by the Einsteinian physics?
One prediction is - 99766. From the
postulates. The second prediction is -
86400. From definition.
If the observer brings his own co-moving copy of the Solar System he
will notice that the rotation time of his own copy of Earth won't match
the rotation time of the original Earth.
Post by Maciej Wozniak
And [similarly] with the prediction of
a measurement of a meridian.
Same. He will notice that the length of a meridian won't change on his
own copy of Earth while it will be shorter on the original Earth.
Case closed: SR is consistent.
And GR too. If he is just sitting still wrt to the solar system,
but far out beyond Pluto, he will notice that his clocks run at TCB,
(barycentric coordinate time)
which differs from TAI by about half a second per year,

Jan
Maciej Wozniak
2024-08-07 13:04:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Python
Post by Maciej Wozniak
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
As seen, the definition of second loved so
much to be invoked by relativistic [physicists] -
wasn't valid in the time when [Albert Einstein]
lived and [published]. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt
solar system is measuring the length
of solar day. What is the result predicted
by the Einsteinian physics?
One prediction is - 99766. From the
postulates. The second prediction is -
86400. From definition.
If the observer brings his own co-moving copy of the Solar System he
will notice that the rotation time of his own copy of Earth won't match
the rotation time of the original Earth.
Post by Maciej Wozniak
And [similarly] with the prediction of
a measurement of a meridian.
Same. He will notice that the length of a meridian won't change on his
own copy of Earth while it will be shorter on the original Earth.
Case closed: SR is consistent.
And GR too. If he is just sitting still wrt to the solar system,
but far out beyond Pluto, he will notice that his clocks run at TCB,
(barycentric coordinate time)
which differs from TAI by about half a second per year,
Anyone can check GPS, sorry, poor halfbrain,
the REAl clock rate doesn't match the sick
delusions of your bunch of idiots. Common
sense was warning you.
And with the subject of the thread it has nothing
in common.
Post by J. J. Lodder
Jan
Loading...