Discussion:
Another Mainstream "Science" Long Ago Thoroughly Refuted
(too old to reply)
LaurenceClarkCrossen
2024-09-18 16:15:09 UTC
Permalink
Plate Tectonics has been completely refuted since 1972.
http://www.ncgtjournal.com/ =free since 1990's.
Please see “Faulting Continental Drift” by Lowman =
https://sci-hub.st/10.1002/j.2326-1951.1983.tb02633.x
LaurenceClarkCrossen
2024-09-18 20:14:23 UTC
Permalink
The political nature of science now prevents good science from being
done and isolates mainstream science from criticism. Scientific American
just endorsed Harris for president. -
https://www.axios.com/2024/09/16/scientific-american-kamala-harris-2024

Anyone for refereed journals?
Python
2024-09-18 20:18:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by LaurenceClarkCrossen
The political nature of science now prevents good science from being
done and isolates mainstream science from criticism. Scientific American
just endorsed Harris for president. -
https://www.axios.com/2024/09/16/scientific-american-kamala-harris-2024
While most cranks endorse Trump. How come I am not surprised :-) ?
Mikko
2024-09-19 08:41:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by LaurenceClarkCrossen
Plate Tectonics has been completely refuted since 1972.
http://www.ncgtjournal.com/ =free since 1990's.
Please see “Faulting Continental Drift” by Lowman =
https://sci-hub.st/10.1002/j.2326-1951.1983.tb02633.x
The right goroup for that is not any other than sci.geo.geology.
Hrdly that either but I havn't asked.
--
Mikko
Loading...