Discussion:
Another Mainstream "Science" Long Ago Thoroughly Refuted
Add Reply
LaurenceClarkCrossen
2024-09-18 16:15:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Plate Tectonics has been completely refuted since 1972.
http://www.ncgtjournal.com/ =free since 1990's.
Please see “Faulting Continental Drift” by Lowman =
https://sci-hub.st/10.1002/j.2326-1951.1983.tb02633.x
LaurenceClarkCrossen
2024-09-18 20:14:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
The political nature of science now prevents good science from being
done and isolates mainstream science from criticism. Scientific American
just endorsed Harris for president. -
https://www.axios.com/2024/09/16/scientific-american-kamala-harris-2024

Anyone for refereed journals?
Python
2024-09-18 20:18:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by LaurenceClarkCrossen
The political nature of science now prevents good science from being
done and isolates mainstream science from criticism. Scientific American
just endorsed Harris for president. -
https://www.axios.com/2024/09/16/scientific-american-kamala-harris-2024
While most cranks endorse Trump. How come I am not surprised :-) ?
Mikko
2024-09-19 08:41:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by LaurenceClarkCrossen
Plate Tectonics has been completely refuted since 1972.
http://www.ncgtjournal.com/ =free since 1990's.
Please see “Faulting Continental Drift” by Lowman =
https://sci-hub.st/10.1002/j.2326-1951.1983.tb02633.x
The right goroup for that is not any other than sci.geo.geology.
Hrdly that either but I havn't asked.
--
Mikko
Loading...