Discussion:
Relativity has proven the Ether!
(too old to reply)
LaurenceClarkCrossen
2024-11-19 00:15:04 UTC
Permalink
Relativity has proven the Ether!

Relativity has proven time dilation, saving the ether from the null
result! Now, modern physics has an ether. Paul Anderson conclusively
shows that time dilation exists.
Maciej Wozniak
2024-11-19 07:43:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by LaurenceClarkCrossen
Relativity has proven the Ether!
And marxism-leninism has proven other
idiocies.
LaurenceClarkCrossen
2024-11-19 17:21:36 UTC
Permalink
Wozniak: Marxism also has high prestige in institutions of "higher
learning," where it is considered highly intelligent. For example, it is
considered wise to presume that successful and influential people have
achieved their achievements primarily by "dirty pool" justifying their
overthrow.
Maciej Wozniak
2024-11-19 21:52:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by LaurenceClarkCrossen
Wozniak: Marxism also has high prestige in
but marxism-leninism doesn't.
LaurenceClarkCrossen
2024-11-19 22:10:51 UTC
Permalink
Wozniak: I urge you to watch this video about how Lenin has been made a
saint in the Russian church and given a halo.
"NORTH KOREANS ARE A RED LINE: BRITAIN AND FRANCE JOIN THE US WITH LONG
RANGE STRIKES IN KURSK | 2024"

Ross Finlayson
2024-11-19 22:13:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by LaurenceClarkCrossen
Wozniak: I urge you to watch this video about how Lenin has been made a
saint in the Russian church and given a halo.
"NORTH KOREANS ARE A RED LINE: BRITAIN AND FRANCE JOIN THE US WITH LONG
RANGE STRIKES IN KURSK | 2024"
http://youtu.be/zc8u7OWhrVA
Get that shit out of here.
LaurenceClarkCrossen
2024-11-19 23:39:44 UTC
Permalink
Ross: That's very terse of you! Get what shit out of where? The ether or
time dilation? One must have both or neither. One may want time dilation
for something else but the ether comes with it.
Ross Finlayson
2024-11-20 02:53:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by LaurenceClarkCrossen
Ross: That's very terse of you! Get what shit out of where? The ether or
time dilation? One must have both or neither. One may want time dilation
for something else but the ether comes with it.
Don't be coy, toy, get that useless shit out of here.
Ross Finlayson
2024-11-20 03:37:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ross Finlayson
Post by LaurenceClarkCrossen
Ross: That's very terse of you! Get what shit out of where? The ether or
time dilation? One must have both or neither. One may want time dilation
for something else but the ether comes with it.
Don't be coy, toy, get that useless shit out of here.
The theory of SR is a computable, successful theory
for some matters of complementary concerns in
electronics and radiation, according to a stack of
what's called "electron phyics", and GR is similarly
a computable, i.e. simplifying, successful theory
with regards to some complementary concerns
of station-keeping and a "severe abstraction" of
a "mechanical reduction", that's what there is to
it, so if you got problems with that, then the issues
are in "electron physics" and "the severe abstraction
of a mechanical reduction".

Then otherwise your fallacious rhetoric is shit.

Do you know why there's other than "electron physics"
and there's a better "severe abstraction of a mechanical
reduction"? Because relativity is just a theory, ....
Ross Finlayson
2024-11-20 04:01:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ross Finlayson
Post by Ross Finlayson
Post by LaurenceClarkCrossen
Ross: That's very terse of you! Get what shit out of where? The ether or
time dilation? One must have both or neither. One may want time dilation
for something else but the ether comes with it.
Don't be coy, toy, get that useless shit out of here.
The theory of SR is a computable, successful theory
for some matters of complementary concerns in
electronics and radiation, according to a stack of
what's called "electron phyics", and GR is similarly
a computable, i.e. simplifying, successful theory
with regards to some complementary concerns
of station-keeping and a "severe abstraction" of
a "mechanical reduction", that's what there is to
it, so if you got problems with that, then the issues
are in "electron physics" and "the severe abstraction
of a mechanical reduction".
Then otherwise your fallacious rhetoric is shit.
Do you know why there's other than "electron physics"
and there's a better "severe abstraction of a mechanical
reduction"? Because relativity is just a theory, ....
That "there's an ether", or these days "aether",
is independent "relativity theory".

What that means for "electron physics" and "the current
formalism of a severe abstraction of a mechanical reduction",
has that many, like Einstein, arrive at both an "aether hypothesis",
that space-time is a plain frame, and a "clock hypothesis",
that space-time has a plain main.

Then, there's physics in it.

Or, at least according to what Einstein wrote himself,
besides what people make of it.
LaurenceClarkCrossen
2024-11-21 00:03:58 UTC
Permalink
Ross: Time dilation is all that is needed to save the ether from the
null result. Now we have both! Ether and time dilation. Why can't you
acknowledge that?
LaurenceClarkCrossen
2024-11-21 00:01:05 UTC
Permalink
Ross: I can't read minds, but if you mean talk of ideology, that is all
relativity really is. Please see the above cited article.
LaurenceClarkCrossen
2024-11-19 17:37:43 UTC
Permalink
Wozniak: Just like relativity, Marxism is readily refutable by
elementary logic. It relies on tribal instincts to over-generalize about
groups of people who are then characterized as oppressors and oppressed.
“Men are more easily governed through their vices than through their
virtues.”
― Napoleon Bonaparte

Marxism is the method for doing this.

By the way, relativity is essentially an ideology; it is so irrational.
Peter Hayes's "The Ideology of Relativity: The Case of the Clock
Paradox" explains that relativity "functions as an ideology."
LaurenceClarkCrossen
2024-11-19 21:10:50 UTC
Permalink
Wozniak: The relativists like to express their disrespect and disregard
for logic as if we didn't realize that.
"Why Are Ivy League College Students Being Treated Like Babies Now?"

Mikko
2024-11-20 09:39:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by LaurenceClarkCrossen
Relativity has proven the Ether!
Relativity has proven time dilation, saving the ether from the null
result! Now, modern physics has an ether. Paul Anderson conclusively
shows that time dilation exists.
Your unjustified claims are not interesting.
--
Mikko
LaurenceClarkCrossen
2024-11-21 00:06:26 UTC
Permalink
Mikko: How can you deny there is an ether when you accept time dilation?
Your claims are not consistent.
Mikko
2024-11-22 08:53:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by LaurenceClarkCrossen
Mikko: How can you deny there is an ether when you accept time dilation?
Your claims are not consistent.
Your claim about incosistency is as unjustified as your claims about
ether and time dilation.
--
Mikko
Maciej Wozniak
2024-11-22 09:59:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mikko
Post by LaurenceClarkCrossen
Mikko: How can you deny there is an ether when you accept time dilation?
Your claims are not consistent.
Your claim about incosistency is as unjustified as
It's been proven and some fanatic idiots
screaming "NOOOO!!!!" are changing nothing.

Loading...