Discussion:
Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed
(too old to reply)
bertietaylor
2024-10-06 02:55:39 UTC
Permalink
The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
Arindam Banerjee,
HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne
10 Nov 2023
(All rights reserved)

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ

***

Experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun


Which is improved upon in, and its potential for ejecting matter into
near space , and horizontal tunneling shown in


and the following shows how a new class of linear motor violating
inertia can be developed by arresting the momentum of the armature and
imparting that to the whole system, giving it an increased velocity


*****

Introduction to "A New Look Towards the Principles of Motion"
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/1wmee5C8mFs/kJMPdnFkAwAJ

Section 1
Linear Motion, Momentum, Force, Energy, Internal Force Engines, and the
design of Interstellar Spacecraft
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/GbpQC3a2d1Q/jSXQeb9kAwAJ

Section 1 (contd.)
Linear Motion, Momentum, Force, Energy, Internal Force Engines, and the
design of Interstellar Spacecraft
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/P9ZiinIDhHU/ZtMQVyliBQAJ

Section 2
The Creation and Destruction of Energy
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/wY6_9V8ucSY/3nnJQk9iBQAJ

Section 3
The Structure of Heavenly Bodies
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/8jH-SQIFFDo/O1jn3HpiBQAJ

Section 4
The Nature of Explosion
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/7TkOVZigFHg/uv43_aZiBQAJ

Section 5
The forces involved in rotational motion
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/jhgcsTq-NrQ/ZBwG8S9jBQAJ

*******

2017 videos of rail gun experiments with theory in detail


IFE - 1 Ground Experiments


IFE - 2 Experimental setups


IFE - 3 Pendulum experiments


IFE - 4 Evolution of spaceship


IFE - 5 Hydrogen Transmission Network


IFE - 6 Spaceship Design


IFE - 7 Anti-Gravity


IFE - 8 New Physics

****
The physics aphorisms of Arindam
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/8HgH3sbRe94/m/gYzu9OAkAgAJ

The cause of gravity
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/mmigkl3yZYc/m/8Rs16NCXAAAJ

Explaining the nova and supernova phenomena with new physics theories -
1
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/6UIGDNHH7n0/m/U0t-kYqgAAAJ

Explaining the nova and supernova phenomena with new physics theories -
2
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/CffbGTXV72c/m/5ONP6J6gAAAJ

*****
Jim Pennino
2024-10-06 03:42:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by bertietaylor
The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
Posting the same inane delusional nonsense multiple times just makes it
more inane Arindam.

<snip delusional nonsense unread>
bertietaylor
2024-10-06 04:41:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jim Pennino
Post by bertietaylor
The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
Posting the same inane delusional nonsense multiple times just makes it
more inane Arindam.
<snip delusional nonsense unread>
Chap asks for information and calls it delusional nonsense without
reading.

As evidently he represents the physics community that community must be
totally corrupt to the core.
Jim Pennino
2024-10-06 13:01:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by bertietaylor
Post by Jim Pennino
Post by bertietaylor
The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
Posting the same inane delusional nonsense multiple times just makes it
more inane Arindam.
<snip delusional nonsense unread>
Chap asks for information and calls it delusional nonsense without
reading.
It was raving, delusional nonsense the first time I read it. Reading it
again will not change that Arindam.

<snip>
Maciej Wozniak
2024-10-06 13:41:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jim Pennino
Post by bertietaylor
Post by Jim Pennino
Post by bertietaylor
The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
Posting the same inane delusional nonsense multiple times just makes it
more inane Arindam.
<snip delusional nonsense unread>
Chap asks for information and calls it delusional nonsense without
reading.
It was raving, delusional nonsense the first time I read it. Reading it
again will not change that Arindam.
<snip>
- It's not just me and my idiot guru saying!
It's MUONS!!! And EXPERIMENTS!!! And the
overwhelming majority saying!!!!!

- but experiments can't speak and the
overwhelming majority is not even aware
of your idiocies...

- UUUU!!! UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!! UUUUUUUUUU!!!!
PLONK!!!!!
bertietaylor
2024-10-20 23:38:35 UTC
Permalink
Quite likely the penisnino is a Dark Age Inquisitor type Bible thumper.
Always trying to replace science with sanctioned nonsense.

Woof-woof

What fools these apes be!

Bertietaylor
Jim Pennino
2024-10-21 01:36:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by bertietaylor
Quite likely the penisnino is a Dark Age Inquisitor type Bible thumper.
Always trying to replace science with sanctioned nonsense.
Delusional babble of a multiple personality crackpot and typical thereof
when confronted by facts that challenge the crackpot's delusions, e.g.
that efficiency is generally trivial to measure and that real railguns
have efficiencies of around 50%.
Post by bertietaylor
Woof-woof
What fools these apes be!
Bertietaylor - The delusional, penis obsessed, multiple personality
crackpot's other personality
Aether Regained
2024-10-11 12:28:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by bertietaylor
The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
Arindam Banerjee,
HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne
10 Nov 2023
(All rights reserved)
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ
***
Experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun
http://youtu.be/zYtyOMbgiZ0
Which is improved upon in, and its potential for ejecting matter into
near space , and horizontal tunneling shown in
http://youtu.be/o6pjy0Wvujs
and the following shows how a new class of linear motor violating
inertia can be developed by arresting the momentum of the armature and
imparting that to the whole system, giving it an increased velocity
http://youtu.be/idsIuzEajTc
@Arindam (there is no need to use the transparent bertietaylor alias):

If the aether is fluid-like, which I believe it to be, as opposed to
your belief that the aether is solid-like, then there is a simple
disproof of your "violation of inertia" claim:

There is no violation of inertia or conservation-of-momentum in fluid
mechanics: any unseen/unaccounted for momentum is carried away by the fluid!
J. J. Lodder
2024-10-12 09:52:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Aether Regained
Post by bertietaylor
The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
Arindam Banerjee,
HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne
10 Nov 2023
(All rights reserved)
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ
***
Experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun
http://youtu.be/zYtyOMbgiZ0
Which is improved upon in, and its potential for ejecting matter into
near space , and horizontal tunneling shown in
http://youtu.be/o6pjy0Wvujs
and the following shows how a new class of linear motor violating
inertia can be developed by arresting the momentum of the armature and
imparting that to the whole system, giving it an increased velocity
http://youtu.be/idsIuzEajTc
If the aether is fluid-like, which I believe it to be, as opposed to
your belief that the aether is solid-like, then there is a simple
There is no violation of inertia or conservation-of-momentum in fluid
mechanics: any unseen/unaccounted for momentum is carried away by the fluid!
As 'everybody' in the 19th century already knew:
the aether must be solid-like.
A fluid aether cannot support transversverse waves,
and this is what electromagnetic waves obviously are.

As for Woofster's claims about inertia violations:
they are bunk, with or without an aether,

Jan
Bertietaylor
2024-10-13 01:01:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Aether Regained
Post by bertietaylor
The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
Arindam Banerjee,
HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne
10 Nov 2023
(All rights reserved)
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ
***
Experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun
http://youtu.be/zYtyOMbgiZ0
Which is improved upon in, and its potential for ejecting matter into
near space , and horizontal tunneling shown in
http://youtu.be/o6pjy0Wvujs
and the following shows how a new class of linear motor violating
inertia can be developed by arresting the momentum of the armature and
imparting that to the whole system, giving it an increased velocity
http://youtu.be/idsIuzEajTc
If the aether is fluid-like, which I believe it to be, as opposed to
your belief that the aether is solid-like, then there is a simple
There is no violation of inertia or conservation-of-momentum in fluid
mechanics: any unseen/unaccounted for momentum is carried away by the fluid!
the aether must be solid-like.
A fluid aether cannot support transversverse waves,
and this is what electromagnetic waves obviously are.
they are bunk, with or without an aether,
Jan
Another e=mcc chap denying reality of inertia violation by Arindam's
rail gun experiment. This one seems better informed, though.
Athel Cornish-Bowden
2024-10-13 10:42:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Aether Regained
Post by bertietaylor
The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
Arindam Banerjee,
HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne
10 Nov 2023
(All rights reserved)
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ
***
Experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun
http://youtu.be/zYtyOMbgiZ0
Which is improved upon in, and its potential for ejecting matter into
near space , and horizontal tunneling shown in
http://youtu.be/o6pjy0Wvujs
and the following shows how a new class of linear motor violating
inertia can be developed by arresting the momentum of the armature and
imparting that to the whole system, giving it an increased velocity
http://youtu.be/idsIuzEajTc
If the aether is fluid-like, which I believe it to be, as opposed to
your belief that the aether is solid-like, then there is a simple
There is no violation of inertia or conservation-of-momentum in fluid
mechanics: any unseen/unaccounted for momentum is carried away by the fluid!
the aether must be solid-like.
A fluid aether cannot support transversverse waves,
and this is what electromagnetic waves obviously are.
they are bunk, with or without an aether,
Jan
Another e=mcc chap denying reality of inertia violation by Arindam's
rail gun experiment.
Where is this work published (in a serious journal)?
Post by Bertietaylor
This one seems better informed, though.
--
Athel -- French and British, living in Marseilles for 37 years; mainly
in England until 1987.
Bertietaylor
2024-10-13 19:16:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Aether Regained
Post by bertietaylor
The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
Arindam Banerjee,
HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne
10 Nov 2023
(All rights reserved)
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ
***
Experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun
http://youtu.be/zYtyOMbgiZ0
Which is improved upon in, and its potential for ejecting matter into
near space , and horizontal tunneling shown in
http://youtu.be/o6pjy0Wvujs
and the following shows how a new class of linear motor violating
inertia can be developed by arresting the momentum of the armature and
imparting that to the whole system, giving it an increased velocity
http://youtu.be/idsIuzEajTc
If the aether is fluid-like, which I believe it to be, as opposed to
your belief that the aether is solid-like, then there is a simple
There is no violation of inertia or conservation-of-momentum in fluid
mechanics: any unseen/unaccounted for momentum is carried away by the fluid!
the aether must be solid-like.
A fluid aether cannot support transversverse waves,
and this is what electromagnetic waves obviously are.
they are bunk, with or without an aether,
Jan
Another e=mcc chap denying reality of inertia violation by Arindam's
rail gun experiment.
Where is this work published (in a serious journal)?
Why bother about journals? Why not look at what has been done?
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by Bertietaylor
This one seems better informed, though.
Bertietaylor
2024-10-13 19:34:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Aether Regained
Post by bertietaylor
The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
Arindam Banerjee,
HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne
10 Nov 2023
(All rights reserved)
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ
***
Experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun
http://youtu.be/zYtyOMbgiZ0
Which is improved upon in, and its potential for ejecting matter into
near space , and horizontal tunneling shown in
http://youtu.be/o6pjy0Wvujs
and the following shows how a new class of linear motor violating
inertia can be developed by arresting the momentum of the armature and
imparting that to the whole system, giving it an increased velocity
http://youtu.be/idsIuzEajTc
If the aether is fluid-like, which I believe it to be, as opposed to
your belief that the aether is solid-like, then there is a simple
There is no violation of inertia or conservation-of-momentum in fluid
mechanics: any unseen/unaccounted for momentum is carried away by the fluid!
the aether must be solid-like.
A fluid aether cannot support transversverse waves,
and this is what electromagnetic waves obviously are.
they are bunk, with or without an aether,
Jan
Another e=mcc chap denying reality of inertia violation by Arindam's
rail gun experiment.
Where is this work published (in a serious journal)?
Why bother about journals? Why not look at what has been done?
The big question is, what will the great-great physicists do when
Arindam with his new physics makes a moving machine that produces fuel
instead of consuming fuel? Will they still ignore and mock him?

Arindam will bet they will do just that. He hopes to be wrong. Really
how long will the world remain wilfully blind and foolish? Forever,
sadly.
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by Bertietaylor
This one seems better informed, though.
J. J. Lodder
2024-10-14 09:49:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Aether Regained
Post by bertietaylor
The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
Arindam Banerjee,
HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne
10 Nov 2023
(All rights reserved)
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ
***
Experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun
http://youtu.be/zYtyOMbgiZ0
Which is improved upon in, and its potential for ejecting matter into
near space , and horizontal tunneling shown in
http://youtu.be/o6pjy0Wvujs
and the following shows how a new class of linear motor violating
inertia can be developed by arresting the momentum of the armature and
imparting that to the whole system, giving it an increased velocity
http://youtu.be/idsIuzEajTc
If the aether is fluid-like, which I believe it to be, as opposed to
your belief that the aether is solid-like, then there is a simple
There is no violation of inertia or conservation-of-momentum in fluid
mechanics: any unseen/unaccounted for momentum is carried away by the fluid!
the aether must be solid-like.
A fluid aether cannot support transversverse waves,
and this is what electromagnetic waves obviously are.
they are bunk, with or without an aether,
Jan
Another e=mcc chap denying reality of inertia violation by Arindam's
rail gun experiment.
Where is this work published (in a serious journal)?
Why bother about journals? Why not look at what has been done?
Nothing has been done until it has generated some peer approval,
or at least a tiny bit of peer interest,

Jan
Athel Cornish-Bowden
2024-10-14 14:09:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Aether Regained
Post by bertietaylor
The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
Arindam Banerjee,
HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne
10 Nov 2023
(All rights reserved)
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ
***
Experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun
http://youtu.be/zYtyOMbgiZ0
Which is improved upon in, and its potential for ejecting matter into
near space , and horizontal tunneling shown in
http://youtu.be/o6pjy0Wvujs
and the following shows how a new class of linear motor violating
inertia can be developed by arresting the momentum of the armature and
imparting that to the whole system, giving it an increased velocity
http://youtu.be/idsIuzEajTc
If the aether is fluid-like, which I believe it to be, as opposed to
your belief that the aether is solid-like, then there is a simple
There is no violation of inertia or conservation-of-momentum in fluid
mechanics: any unseen/unaccounted for momentum is carried away by the fluid!
the aether must be solid-like.
A fluid aether cannot support transversverse waves,
and this is what electromagnetic waves obviously are.
they are bunk, with or without an aether,
Jan
Another e=mcc chap denying reality of inertia violation by Arindam's
rail gun experiment.
Where is this work published (in a serious journal)?
Why bother about journals? Why not look at what has been done?
Nothing has been done until it has generated some peer approval,
or at least a tiny bit of peer interest,
Right. Let us suppose (a huge supposition, and almost certainly false)
that Arindam's inertia violation turns out to be correct. Will he get
credit for it? No, the discovery will be attributed in the textbooks to
the scientist who described and discussed it in a serious journal. The
best he can hope for is a footnote saying "Banerjee claimed some years
earlier in popular science sources that inertia violation could occur,
but he provided no verifiable evidence of the claim." I'm reminded of
Marie Mikhailovna Manasseïn: few people today have heard of her, and of
those few virtually none accept her claim to have discovered cell-free
fermentation 15 or so years before Eduard Buchner. OK, her results were
published in a serious journal (Ber. dt. Chem. Ges. (1872)), but her
experiments were unverifiable, and were very badly designed.
--
Athel -- French and British, living in Marseilles for 37 years; mainly
in England until 1987.
Athel Cornish-Bowden
2024-10-15 07:29:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Aether Regained
Post by bertietaylor
The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
Arindam Banerjee,
HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne
10 Nov 2023
(All rights reserved)
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ
***
Experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun
http://youtu.be/zYtyOMbgiZ0
Which is improved upon in, and its potential for ejecting matter into
near space , and horizontal tunneling shown in
http://youtu.be/o6pjy0Wvujs
and the following shows how a new class of linear motor violating
inertia can be developed by arresting the momentum of the armature and
imparting that to the whole system, giving it an increased velocity
http://youtu.be/idsIuzEajTc
If the aether is fluid-like, which I believe it to be, as opposed to
your belief that the aether is solid-like, then there is a simple
There is no violation of inertia or conservation-of-momentum in fluid
mechanics: any unseen/unaccounted for momentum is carried away by the fluid!
the aether must be solid-like.
A fluid aether cannot support transversverse waves,
and this is what electromagnetic waves obviously are.
they are bunk, with or without an aether,
Jan
Another e=mcc chap denying reality of inertia violation by Arindam's
rail gun experiment.
Where is this work published (in a serious journal)?
Why bother about journals? Why not look at what has been done?
Nothing has been done until it has generated some peer approval,
or at least a tiny bit of peer interest,
Right. Let us suppose (a huge supposition, and almost certainly false)
that Arindam's inertia violation turns out to be correct. Will he get
credit for it? No, the discovery will be attributed in the textbooks to
the scientist who described and discussed it in a serious journal. The
best he can hope for is a footnote saying "Banerjee claimed some years
earlier in popular science sources that inertia violation could occur,
but he provided no verifiable evidence of the claim." I'm reminded of
Marie Mikhailovna Manasseïn: few people today have heard of her, and of
those few virtually none accept her claim to have discovered cell-free
fermentation 15
25. I'm not getting any younger, and arithmetic that would have once
been utterly trivial is now error-prone.
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
or so years before Eduard Buchner. OK, her results were published in a
serious journal (Ber. dt. Chem. Ges. (1872)), but her experiments were
unverifiable, and were very badly designed.
--
Athel -- French and British, living in Marseilles for 37 years; mainly
in England until 1987.
J. J. Lodder
2024-10-15 07:55:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Aether Regained
Post by bertietaylor
The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
Arindam Banerjee,
HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne
10 Nov 2023
(All rights reserved)
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ
***
Experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun
http://youtu.be/zYtyOMbgiZ0
Which is improved upon in, and its potential for ejecting matter into
near space , and horizontal tunneling shown in
http://youtu.be/o6pjy0Wvujs
and the following shows how a new class of linear motor violating
inertia can be developed by arresting the momentum of the armature and
imparting that to the whole system, giving it an increased velocity
http://youtu.be/idsIuzEajTc
If the aether is fluid-like, which I believe it to be, as opposed to
your belief that the aether is solid-like, then there is a simple
There is no violation of inertia or conservation-of-momentum in fluid
mechanics: any unseen/unaccounted for momentum is carried away by the fluid!
the aether must be solid-like.
A fluid aether cannot support transversverse waves,
and this is what electromagnetic waves obviously are.
they are bunk, with or without an aether,
Jan
Another e=mcc chap denying reality of inertia violation by Arindam's
rail gun experiment.
Where is this work published (in a serious journal)?
Why bother about journals? Why not look at what has been done?
Nothing has been done until it has generated some peer approval,
or at least a tiny bit of peer interest,
Right. Let us suppose (a huge supposition, and almost certainly false)
that Arindam's inertia violation turns out to be correct. Will he get
credit for it? No, the discovery will be attributed in the textbooks to
the scientist who described and discussed it in a serious journal. The
best he can hope for is a footnote saying "Banerjee claimed some years
earlier in popular science sources that inertia violation could occur,
but he provided no verifiable evidence of the claim." I'm reminded of
Marie Mikhailovna Manasseïn: few people today have heard of her, and of
those few virtually none accept her claim to have discovered cell-free
fermentation 15 or so years before Eduard Buchner. OK, her results were
published in a serious journal (Ber. dt. Chem. Ges. (1872)), but her
experiments were unverifiable, and were very badly designed.
Yes, and Bucher even got a Nobel prize for it.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maria_Manaseina>

Jan
Athel Cornish-Bowden
2024-10-15 12:40:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Where is this work published (in a serious journal)?
Why bother about journals? Why not look at what has been done?
Nothing has been done until it has generated some peer approval,
or at least a tiny bit of peer interest,
Right. Let us suppose (a huge supposition, and almost certainly false)
that Arindam's inertia violation turns out to be correct. Will he get
credit for it? No, the discovery will be attributed in the textbooks to
the scientist who described and discussed it in a serious journal. The
best he can hope for is a footnote saying "Banerjee claimed some years
earlier in popular science sources that inertia violation could occur,
but he provided no verifiable evidence of the claim." I'm reminded of
Marie Mikhailovna Manasseïn: few people today have heard of her, and of
those few virtually none accept her claim to have discovered cell-free
fermentation 15 or so years before Eduard Buchner. OK, her results were
published in a serious journal (Ber. dt. Chem. Ges. (1872)), but her
experiments were unverifiable, and were very badly designed.
Yes, and Bucher even got a Nobel prize for it.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maria_Manaseina>
I had forgotten that Maria Manaseina had a Wikiparticle, and I was
surprised to see that I had edited it in March 2021, removing an
irrelevant reference inserted by someone determined to insert
references to himself in as many pages as possible.

Maybe Arindam could pay someone (not allowed, but not easy to
recognize) to write a Wikiparticle about himself. It's the closest
he'll ever get to fame.
--
Athel -- French and British, living in Marseilles for 37 years; mainly
in England until 1987.
Bertietaylor
2024-10-15 21:52:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Where is this work published (in a serious journal)?
Why bother about journals? Why not look at what has been done?
Nothing has been done until it has generated some peer approval,
or at least a tiny bit of peer interest,
Right. Let us suppose (a huge supposition, and almost certainly false)
that Arindam's inertia violation turns out to be correct. Will he get
credit for it? No, the discovery will be attributed in the textbooks to
the scientist who described and discussed it in a serious journal. The
best he can hope for is a footnote saying "Banerjee claimed some years
earlier in popular science sources that inertia violation could occur,
but he provided no verifiable evidence of the claim." I'm reminded of
Marie Mikhailovna Manasseïn: few people today have heard of her, and of
those few virtually none accept her claim to have discovered cell-free
fermentation 15 or so years before Eduard Buchner. OK, her results were
published in a serious journal (Ber. dt. Chem. Ges. (1872)), but her
experiments were unverifiable, and were very badly designed.
Yes, and Bucher even got a Nobel prize for it.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maria_Manaseina>
I had forgotten that Maria Manaseina had a Wikiparticle, and I was
surprised to see that I had edited it in March 2021, removing an
irrelevant reference inserted by someone determined to insert
references to himself in as many pages as possible.
Maybe Arindam could pay someone (not allowed, but not easy to
recognize) to write a Wikiparticle about himself. It's the closest
he'll ever get to fame.
Arindam is well-known in his social group. Over the years, thousands of
people in various continents have seen him, heard him and read his
writings. Also profited from his inventions. He does not need to pay
anyone. We his cyberdogs are his only friends in public space. For all
the kibble and care he gave us, we, unlike the cowardly careerist
jealous mean biased apes, provide due returns.

Woof-woof

Bertietaylor
J. J. Lodder
2024-10-16 07:56:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Where is this work published (in a serious journal)?
Why bother about journals? Why not look at what has been done?
Nothing has been done until it has generated some peer approval,
or at least a tiny bit of peer interest,
Right. Let us suppose (a huge supposition, and almost certainly false)
that Arindam's inertia violation turns out to be correct. Will he get
credit for it? No, the discovery will be attributed in the textbooks to
the scientist who described and discussed it in a serious journal. The
best he can hope for is a footnote saying "Banerjee claimed some years
earlier in popular science sources that inertia violation could occur,
but he provided no verifiable evidence of the claim." I'm reminded of
Marie Mikhailovna Manasseïn: few people today have heard of her, and of
those few virtually none accept her claim to have discovered cell-free
fermentation 15 or so years before Eduard Buchner. OK, her results were
published in a serious journal (Ber. dt. Chem. Ges. (1872)), but her
experiments were unverifiable, and were very badly designed.
Yes, and Bucher even got a Nobel prize for it.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maria_Manaseina>
I had forgotten that Maria Manaseina had a Wikiparticle, and I was
surprised to see that I had edited it in March 2021, removing an
irrelevant reference inserted by someone determined to insert
references to himself in as many pages as possible.
Maybe Arindam could pay someone (not allowed, but not easy to
recognize) to write a Wikiparticle about himself. It's the closest
he'll ever get to fame.
Since he seems to have published nothing
(usenet and youtube don't count of course)
it will be hard to find secondary references.
The Deletians will get whatever he may try to put up,

Jan
Bertietaylor
2024-10-16 08:48:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Where is this work published (in a serious journal)?
Why bother about journals? Why not look at what has been done?
Nothing has been done until it has generated some peer approval,
or at least a tiny bit of peer interest,
Right. Let us suppose (a huge supposition, and almost certainly false)
that Arindam's inertia violation turns out to be correct. Will he get
credit for it? No, the discovery will be attributed in the textbooks to
the scientist who described and discussed it in a serious journal. The
best he can hope for is a footnote saying "Banerjee claimed some years
earlier in popular science sources that inertia violation could occur,
but he provided no verifiable evidence of the claim." I'm reminded of
Marie Mikhailovna Manasseïn: few people today have heard of her, and of
those few virtually none accept her claim to have discovered cell-free
fermentation 15 or so years before Eduard Buchner. OK, her results were
published in a serious journal (Ber. dt. Chem. Ges. (1872)), but her
experiments were unverifiable, and were very badly designed.
Yes, and Bucher even got a Nobel prize for it.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maria_Manaseina>
I had forgotten that Maria Manaseina had a Wikiparticle, and I was
surprised to see that I had edited it in March 2021, removing an
irrelevant reference inserted by someone determined to insert
references to himself in as many pages as possible.
Maybe Arindam could pay someone (not allowed, but not easy to
recognize) to write a Wikiparticle about himself. It's the closest
he'll ever get to fame.
Since he seems to have published nothing
(usenet and youtube don't count of course)
Arindam has published a few papers in conferences.

They relate to a range of subjects. From partial match retrieval to rail
guns to the hydrogen transmission network. On stripline circuits,
integrated IFF, and a design for MST radar antenna. He has worked for 30
years in Research and Development. He had a patent from Australia for
the HTN.

He is the greatest master of the English language as evident from all
his posts on Usenet.

As he is an unapologetic brown Hindu and a brahmin at that, he is
subjected to unrelenting oppression from all sides except his close
family and friends.

As he has the Divine on his side he cares not for the machinations of
the ungodly.

Woof-woof

Bertietaylor
Athel Cornish-Bowden
2024-10-16 09:18:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Where is this work published (in a serious journal)?
Why bother about journals? Why not look at what has been done?
Nothing has been done until it has generated some peer approval,
or at least a tiny bit of peer interest,
Right. Let us suppose (a huge supposition, and almost certainly false)
that Arindam's inertia violation turns out to be correct. Will he get
credit for it? No, the discovery will be attributed in the textbooks to
the scientist who described and discussed it in a serious journal. The
best he can hope for is a footnote saying "Banerjee claimed some years
earlier in popular science sources that inertia violation could occur,
but he provided no verifiable evidence of the claim." I'm reminded of
Marie Mikhailovna Manasseïn: few people today have heard of her, and of
those few virtually none accept her claim to have discovered cell-free
fermentation 15 or so years before Eduard Buchner. OK, her results were
published in a serious journal (Ber. dt. Chem. Ges. (1872)), but her
experiments were unverifiable, and were very badly designed.
Yes, and Bucher even got a Nobel prize for it.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maria_Manaseina>
I had forgotten that Maria Manaseina had a Wikiparticle, and I was
surprised to see that I had edited it in March 2021, removing an
irrelevant reference inserted by someone determined to insert
references to himself in as many pages as possible.
Maybe Arindam could pay someone (not allowed, but not easy to
recognize) to write a Wikiparticle about himself. It's the closest
he'll ever get to fame.
Since he seems to have published nothing
(usenet and youtube don't count of course)
Arindam has published a few papers in conferences.
Conference papers are not usually refereed, for the sort of conferences
that I go to.
Post by Bertietaylor
They relate to a range of subjects. From partial match retrieval to rail
guns to the hydrogen transmission network. On stripline circuits,
integrated IFF, and a design for MST radar antenna. He has worked for 30
years in Research and Development. He had a patent from Australia for
the HTN.
He is the greatest master of the English language as evident from all
his posts on Usenet.
Is he also a painter that would put Leonardo to shame?

What about music? Is he a much better violinist than Yehudi Menuhin ever was?
Post by Bertietaylor
As he is an unapologetic brown Hindu and a brahmin at that, he is
subjected to unrelenting oppression from all sides except his close
family and friends.
As he has the Divine on his side he cares not for the machinations of
the ungodly.
Woof-woof
Bertietaylor
--
Athel -- French and British, living in Marseilles for 37 years; mainly
in England until 1987.
bertietaylor
2024-10-16 11:44:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Where is this work published (in a serious journal)?
Why bother about journals? Why not look at what has been done?
Nothing has been done until it has generated some peer approval,
or at least a tiny bit of peer interest,
Right. Let us suppose (a huge supposition, and almost certainly false)
that Arindam's inertia violation turns out to be correct. Will he get
credit for it? No, the discovery will be attributed in the textbooks to
the scientist who described and discussed it in a serious journal. The
best he can hope for is a footnote saying "Banerjee claimed some years
earlier in popular science sources that inertia violation could occur,
but he provided no verifiable evidence of the claim." I'm reminded of
Marie Mikhailovna Manasseïn: few people today have heard of her, and of
those few virtually none accept her claim to have discovered cell-free
fermentation 15 or so years before Eduard Buchner. OK, her results were
published in a serious journal (Ber. dt. Chem. Ges. (1872)), but her
experiments were unverifiable, and were very badly designed.
Yes, and Bucher even got a Nobel prize for it.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maria_Manaseina>
I had forgotten that Maria Manaseina had a Wikiparticle, and I was
surprised to see that I had edited it in March 2021, removing an
irrelevant reference inserted by someone determined to insert
references to himself in as many pages as possible.
Maybe Arindam could pay someone (not allowed, but not easy to
recognize) to write a Wikiparticle about himself. It's the closest
he'll ever get to fame.
Since he seems to have published nothing
(usenet and youtube don't count of course)
Arindam has published a few papers in conferences.
Conference papers are not usually refereed, for the sort of conferences
that I go to.
His conference papers are archived. The links are online. Yes the racist
European referees threw out his papers but Arindam had better luck with
Asians.
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by Bertietaylor
They relate to a range of subjects. From partial match retrieval to rail
guns to the hydrogen transmission network. On stripline circuits,
integrated IFF, and a design for MST radar antenna. He has worked for 30
years in Research and Development. He had a patent from Australia for
the HTN.
He is the greatest master of the English language as evident from all
his posts on Usenet.
Is he also a painter that would put Leonardo to shame?
He is a great photographer, much more efficient than da Vinci that way.
And his wife is more beautiful tham Mona Lisa. Arindam too is a stunner
with a magnificent voice. Well known on the Bengali stage and it is said
that his Sanskrit recitations such as the MahaChandiPaaTh are unmatched
with spine-tingling quality.
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
What about music? Is he a much better violinist than Yehudi Menuhin ever was?
No. He cannot play any musical instrument. However his lyrics surpass
the Beatles or anyone else. Just magnificent. We would have concerts in
his car, while driving down the Australian roads. What fun! What joy!
Arindam sang one of his songs in public to an ecstatic audience. But
never again, for his wife made him promise never to do that again. Cheap
popularity is not for Arindam.
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by Bertietaylor
As he is an unapologetic brown Hindu and a brahmin at that, he is
subjected to unrelenting oppression from all sides except his close
family and friends.
As he has the Divine on his side he cares not for the machinations of
the ungodly.
Woof-woof
Bertietaylor
J. J. Lodder
2024-10-16 17:58:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by bertietaylor
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Where is this work published (in a serious journal)?
Why bother about journals? Why not look at what has been done?
Nothing has been done until it has generated some peer approval,
or at least a tiny bit of peer interest,
Right. Let us suppose (a huge supposition, and almost certainly false)
that Arindam's inertia violation turns out to be correct. Will he get
credit for it? No, the discovery will be attributed in the textbooks to
the scientist who described and discussed it in a serious journal. The
best he can hope for is a footnote saying "Banerjee claimed some years
earlier in popular science sources that inertia violation could occur,
but he provided no verifiable evidence of the claim." I'm reminded of
Marie Mikhailovna Manasseïn: few people today have heard of her, and of
those few virtually none accept her claim to have discovered cell-free
fermentation 15 or so years before Eduard Buchner. OK, her results were
published in a serious journal (Ber. dt. Chem. Ges. (1872)), but her
experiments were unverifiable, and were very badly designed.
Yes, and Bucher even got a Nobel prize for it.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maria_Manaseina>
I had forgotten that Maria Manaseina had a Wikiparticle, and I was
surprised to see that I had edited it in March 2021, removing an
irrelevant reference inserted by someone determined to insert
references to himself in as many pages as possible.
Maybe Arindam could pay someone (not allowed, but not easy to
recognize) to write a Wikiparticle about himself. It's the closest
he'll ever get to fame.
Since he seems to have published nothing
(usenet and youtube don't count of course)
Arindam has published a few papers in conferences.
Conference papers are not usually refereed, for the sort of conferences
that I go to.
His conference papers are archived. The links are online. Yes the racist
European referees threw out his papers but Arindam had better luck with
Asians.
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by Bertietaylor
They relate to a range of subjects. From partial match retrieval to rail
guns to the hydrogen transmission network. On stripline circuits,
integrated IFF, and a design for MST radar antenna. He has worked for 30
years in Research and Development. He had a patent from Australia for
the HTN.
He is the greatest master of the English language as evident from all
his posts on Usenet.
Is he also a painter that would put Leonardo to shame?
He is a great photographer, much more efficient than da Vinci that way.
And his wife is more beautiful tham Mona Lisa. Arindam too is a stunner
with a magnificent voice. Well known on the Bengali stage and it is said
that his Sanskrit recitations such as the MahaChandiPaaTh are unmatched
with spine-tingling quality.
I just can't bring myself o believe
that it could be superior to Vogon poetry,

Jan
gharnagel
2024-10-16 19:02:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. J. Lodder
... and it is said that his Sanskrit recitations such as the
MahaChandiPaaTh are unmatched with spine-tingling quality.
I just can't bring myself o believe
that it could be superior to Vogon poetry,
Jan
:-)) Ode to a lump of green slime ...
Bertietaylor
2024-10-16 20:38:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by bertietaylor
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Where is this work published (in a serious journal)?
Why bother about journals? Why not look at what has been done?
Nothing has been done until it has generated some peer approval,
or at least a tiny bit of peer interest,
Right. Let us suppose (a huge supposition, and almost certainly false)
that Arindam's inertia violation turns out to be correct. Will he get
credit for it? No, the discovery will be attributed in the textbooks to
the scientist who described and discussed it in a serious journal. The
best he can hope for is a footnote saying "Banerjee claimed some years
earlier in popular science sources that inertia violation could occur,
but he provided no verifiable evidence of the claim." I'm reminded of
Marie Mikhailovna Manasseïn: few people today have heard of her, and of
those few virtually none accept her claim to have discovered cell-free
fermentation 15 or so years before Eduard Buchner. OK, her results were
published in a serious journal (Ber. dt. Chem. Ges. (1872)), but her
experiments were unverifiable, and were very badly designed.
Yes, and Bucher even got a Nobel prize for it.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maria_Manaseina>
I had forgotten that Maria Manaseina had a Wikiparticle, and I was
surprised to see that I had edited it in March 2021, removing an
irrelevant reference inserted by someone determined to insert
references to himself in as many pages as possible.
Maybe Arindam could pay someone (not allowed, but not easy to
recognize) to write a Wikiparticle about himself. It's the closest
he'll ever get to fame.
Since he seems to have published nothing
(usenet and youtube don't count of course)
Arindam has published a few papers in conferences.
Conference papers are not usually refereed, for the sort of conferences
that I go to.
His conference papers are archived. The links are online. Yes the racist
European referees threw out his papers but Arindam had better luck with
Asians.
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by Bertietaylor
They relate to a range of subjects. From partial match retrieval to rail
guns to the hydrogen transmission network. On stripline circuits,
integrated IFF, and a design for MST radar antenna. He has worked for 30
years in Research and Development. He had a patent from Australia for
the HTN.
He is the greatest master of the English language as evident from all
his posts on Usenet.
Is he also a painter that would put Leonardo to shame?
He is a great photographer, much more efficient than da Vinci that way.
And his wife is more beautiful tham Mona Lisa. Arindam too is a stunner
with a magnificent voice. Well known on the Bengali stage and it is said
that his Sanskrit recitations such as the MahaChandiPaaTh are unmatched
with spine-tingling quality.
I just can't bring myself o believe
that it could be superior to Vogon poetry,
You believe in so many nonsenses, Lodder. Like black holes and big bang
theory, expanding universe, entropy, etc.

Woof-woof

What fools these apes be!

Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs)
Post by J. J. Lodder
Jan
Bertietaylor
2024-10-17 01:45:09 UTC
Permalink
Chaps whose minds are permanently warped by their warped view of the
universe cannot see straight.
gharnagel
2024-10-17 03:47:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bertietaylor
Chaps whose minds are permanently warped by their warped view of the
universe cannot see straight.
“‎When you point your finger at someone, anyone, it is often a moment of
judgement. We point our fingers when we want to scold someone, point
out what they have done wrong. But each time we point, we simultaneously
point three fingers back at ourselves.” – Christopher Pike
bertietaylor
2024-10-17 03:58:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by gharnagel
Post by Bertietaylor
Chaps whose minds are permanently warped by their warped view of the
universe cannot see straight.
“‎When you point your finger at someone, anyone, it is often a moment of
judgement. We point our fingers when we want to scold someone, point
out what they have done wrong. But each time we point, we simultaneously
point three fingers back at ourselves.” – Christopher Pike
Yes, that means we have to be critical of ourselves all the time. So
when needs must, we can do the *right* finger-pointing at the devils for
the good of all animal, mineral and vegetable - everywhere, for all
time.

woof-woof
J. J. Lodder
2024-10-17 13:43:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by bertietaylor
Post by Bertietaylor
Chaps whose minds are permanently warped by their warped view of the
universe cannot see straight.
"?When you point your finger at someone, anyone, it is often a moment of
judgement. We point our fingers when we want to scold someone, point
out what they have done wrong. But each time we point, we simultaneously
point three fingers back at ourselves." – Christopher Pike
Yes, that means we have to be critical of ourselves all the time. So
when needs must, we can do the *right* finger-pointing at the devils for
the good of all animal, mineral and vegetable - everywhere, for all
time.
Some more words of wisdom for you:

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the
easiest person to fool." (Richard P. Feynman)

You might take his implied advice,
(but I guess not)

Jan
Bertietaylor
2024-10-17 20:43:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by bertietaylor
Post by Bertietaylor
Chaps whose minds are permanently warped by their warped view of the
universe cannot see straight.
"?When you point your finger at someone, anyone, it is often a moment of
judgement. We point our fingers when we want to scold someone, point
out what they have done wrong. But each time we point, we simultaneously
point three fingers back at ourselves." – Christopher Pike
Yes, that means we have to be critical of ourselves all the time. So
when needs must, we can do the *right* finger-pointing at the devils for
the good of all animal, mineral and vegetable - everywhere, for all
time.
Let's see.
Post by J. J. Lodder
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the
easiest person to fool." (Richard P. Feynman)
If only he practised what he preached.
Arindam is not yet decided about the e=MCC lot being bigger fools or
bigger scoundrels.
Evidently they have mutated from being fools to being scoundrels in
their reaction to Arindam's physics.
Post by J. J. Lodder
You might take his implied advice,
(but I guess not)
Jan
Bertietaylor
2024-10-18 00:12:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by bertietaylor
Post by Bertietaylor
Chaps whose minds are permanently warped by their warped view of the
universe cannot see straight.
"?When you point your finger at someone, anyone, it is often a moment of
judgement. We point our fingers when we want to scold someone, point
out what they have done wrong. But each time we point, we simultaneously
point three fingers back at ourselves." – Christopher Pike
Yes, that means we have to be critical of ourselves all the time. So
when needs must, we can do the *right* finger-pointing at the devils for
the good of all animal, mineral and vegetable - everywhere, for all
time.
Let's see.
Post by J. J. Lodder
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the
easiest person to fool." (Richard P. Feynman)
If only he practised what he preached.
Arindam is not yet decided about the e=MCC lot being bigger fools or
bigger scoundrels.
Evidently they have mutated from being fools to being scoundrels in
their reaction to Arindam's physics.
Which they want to steal without giving any credit to Arindam. Nothing
surprising. Such sorts have stolen entire continents and the resources
of poor nations after learning from the experiences from several
centuries of beating each other up.

Stealing Arindam's works is a trifle for these clever devils.
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by J. J. Lodder
You might take his implied advice,
(but I guess not)
Jan
Bertietaylor
2024-10-18 03:55:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by bertietaylor
Post by Bertietaylor
Chaps whose minds are permanently warped by their warped view of the
universe cannot see straight.
"?When you point your finger at someone, anyone, it is often a moment of
judgement. We point our fingers when we want to scold someone, point
out what they have done wrong. But each time we point, we simultaneously
point three fingers back at ourselves." – Christopher Pike
Yes, that means we have to be critical of ourselves all the time. So
when needs must, we can do the *right* finger-pointing at the devils for
the good of all animal, mineral and vegetable - everywhere, for all
time.
Let's see.
Post by J. J. Lodder
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the
easiest person to fool." (Richard P. Feynman)
If only he practised what he preached.
Arindam is not yet decided about the e=MCC lot being bigger fools or
bigger scoundrels.
Evidently they have mutated from being fools to being scoundrels in
their reaction to Arindam's physics.
Which they want to steal without giving any credit to Arindam. Nothing
surprising. Such sorts have stolen entire continents and the resources
of poor nations after learning from the experiences from several
centuries of beating each other up.
Stealing Arindam's works is a trifle for these clever devils.
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by J. J. Lodder
You might take his implied advice,
(but I guess not)
Guessed right.
Arindam's scientific work is all there but spread all around. It will
need someone intelligent and also dedicated to put them all together.
Arindam could do that but now has no reason to. Why make things easy for
thieves to steal?

Now if one lot steals other lots that will be disadvantaged will howl.
Court battles, jam for lawyers.

So quite a stalemate to be resolved when Arindam gets what he wants.
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by J. J. Lodder
Jan
bertietaylor
2024-10-15 09:18:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Aether Regained
Post by bertietaylor
The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
Arindam Banerjee,
HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne
10 Nov 2023
(All rights reserved)
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ
***
Experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun
http://youtu.be/zYtyOMbgiZ0
Which is improved upon in, and its potential for ejecting matter into
near space , and horizontal tunneling shown in
http://youtu.be/o6pjy0Wvujs
and the following shows how a new class of linear motor violating
inertia can be developed by arresting the momentum of the armature and
imparting that to the whole system, giving it an increased velocity
http://youtu.be/idsIuzEajTc
If the aether is fluid-like, which I believe it to be, as opposed to
your belief that the aether is solid-like, then there is a simple
There is no violation of inertia or conservation-of-momentum in fluid
mechanics: any unseen/unaccounted for momentum is carried away by the fluid!
the aether must be solid-like.
A fluid aether cannot support transversverse waves,
and this is what electromagnetic waves obviously are.
they are bunk, with or without an aether,
Jan
Another e=mcc chap denying reality of inertia violation by Arindam's
rail gun experiment.
Where is this work published (in a serious journal)?
Why bother about journals? Why not look at what has been done?
Nothing has been done until it has generated some peer approval,
or at least a tiny bit of peer interest,
Arindam has no peers. People like Archimedes, Galileo, Newton, Faraday,
Jagadish Bose and Tesla are non-existent today.
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Right. Let us suppose (a huge supposition, and almost certainly false)
that Arindam's inertia violation turns out to be correct.
It is absolutely certainly true, from his video film showing inertia
violation so there is no question of uncertainty. That 2 sec video with
full explanations via graphs has been there for all in the world to see.
While numbers of views can be manipulated, the fact is that it is still
around and so not forced out of circulation. Some goodness still left,
in this corrupt world, thanks to the Gods and Goddesses.
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Will he get
credit for it?
He already has got credit for it, from all honest people who know
Arindam personally and many more who do not.
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
No, the discovery will be attributed in the textbooks to
the scientist who described and discussed it in a serious journal.
We Arindam's celestial cyeberdogs doubt that. Lawyers will step in to
sue the underwear off those who try to steal Arindam's intellectual
property. Let them try. Lawyers will easily show how Arindam was
deprived of this PhD, hounded out of employment, socially ridiculed, got
his conference papers rejected, the papers sent to serious journals
simply ignored with not even a reply.

With the whole world against him, Arindam had no chance for publication
in a serious journal which costs thousands of dollars. He spent 5
thousand dollars to get a conference paper published on the Hydrogen
Transmission network, a patented invention of his. To no gain for him.
So why should be waste time and money in trying to get journal
publication? Far better to post scientific new information on usenet,
youtube, facebook so that it gets freely and cheaply available at once
to all.




The
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
best he can hope for is a footnote saying "Banerjee claimed some years
earlier in popular science sources that inertia violation could occur,
but he provided no verifiable evidence of the claim."
No, not at all. Arindam has provided proof of inertia violation despite
tremendous odds against his. There is no parallel in scientific history
for his lone, and supremely brave achievement. Which he has done not
only simply, cheaply, requiring no financial assistance, no technical or
admin help, no labs, no factories, no sponsors, no friends save us his
dogs - while being a loving son, husband, father and grandfather known
for his acting and culinary skills.



I'm reminded of
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Marie Mikhailovna Manasseïn: few people today have heard of her, and of
those few virtually none accept her claim to have discovered cell-free
fermentation 15 or so years before Eduard Buchner. OK, her results were
published in a serious journal (Ber. dt. Chem. Ges. (1872)), but her
experiments were unverifiable, and were very badly designed.
no comparison with Arindam's work, some of which was done while doing
PhD (which was denied him). His best work came later. While in 2015-2016
he made the first experiments with a weak power source, in later years
he improved the power supply, changed the rail gun design with better
math modelling and now has shown undeniable inertia violation.

Woof-woof

Bertietaylor
J. J. Lodder
2024-10-14 19:38:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Aether Regained
Post by bertietaylor
The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
Arindam Banerjee,
HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne
10 Nov 2023
(All rights reserved)
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ
***
Experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun
http://youtu.be/zYtyOMbgiZ0
Which is improved upon in, and its potential for ejecting matter into
near space , and horizontal tunneling shown in
http://youtu.be/o6pjy0Wvujs
and the following shows how a new class of linear motor violating
inertia can be developed by arresting the momentum of the armature and
imparting that to the whole system, giving it an increased velocity
http://youtu.be/idsIuzEajTc
If the aether is fluid-like, which I believe it to be, as opposed to
your belief that the aether is solid-like, then there is a simple
There is no violation of inertia or conservation-of-momentum in fluid
mechanics: any unseen/unaccounted for momentum is carried away by the fluid!
the aether must be solid-like.
A fluid aether cannot support transversverse waves,
and this is what electromagnetic waves obviously are.
they are bunk, with or without an aether,
Jan
Another e=mcc chap denying reality of inertia violation by Arindam's
rail gun experiment.
Where is this work published (in a serious journal)?
Why bother about journals? Why not look at what has been done?
Because nothing has been done yet.
An experiment isn't an experiment until it has been correctly
interpreted. Your say-so doesn't qualify as correct interpretation.
The first step in achieving that is to publish it under peer review,
to make it likely that the most obvious errors have been avoided.
Next, if it looks worthwhile, others may try to reproduce it.
If they succeed there may be a possibilty that you are on to something.

Base experience so far: all proposed 'reactionless EM drives'
have been found to be based on erroneous interpretation of experiments.
(on more competent testing)
You have not given any reason for believing yours to be any better.

Jan
Bertietaylor
2024-10-15 03:46:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Aether Regained
Post by bertietaylor
The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
Arindam Banerjee,
HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne
10 Nov 2023
(All rights reserved)
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ
***
Experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun
http://youtu.be/zYtyOMbgiZ0
Which is improved upon in, and its potential for ejecting matter into
near space , and horizontal tunneling shown in
http://youtu.be/o6pjy0Wvujs
and the following shows how a new class of linear motor violating
inertia can be developed by arresting the momentum of the armature and
imparting that to the whole system, giving it an increased velocity
http://youtu.be/idsIuzEajTc
If the aether is fluid-like, which I believe it to be, as opposed to
your belief that the aether is solid-like, then there is a simple
There is no violation of inertia or conservation-of-momentum in fluid
mechanics: any unseen/unaccounted for momentum is carried away by the fluid!
the aether must be solid-like.
A fluid aether cannot support transversverse waves,
and this is what electromagnetic waves obviously are.
they are bunk, with or without an aether,
Jan
Another e=mcc chap denying reality of inertia violation by Arindam's
rail gun experiment.
Where is this work published (in a serious journal)?
Why bother about journals? Why not look at what has been done?
Because nothing has been done yet.
What a lie. Arindam has been theorising from 1998 and experimenting from
2014. All the relevant information is online. But while the powers that
be will go to the ends of the universe in search of new things they
strenuously fail to notice Arindam.
Post by J. J. Lodder
An experiment isn't an experiment until it has been correctly
interpreted. Your say-so doesn't qualify as correct interpretation.
Arindam's new design rail gun can be compared to the invention of the
telescope. Anyone can see bigly with that. No doubt there. Whether that
disproved the crystal spheres metaphysics was a matter of interest. The
Cardinals thought it did not shatter the spheres. Earth was still and
all above moved in such crystal spheres. Now satellites circling Jupiter
sorta did seem to be sphere-shattering. Not what their Holinesses wanted
to know! So what to do, but persecute Galileo, the Arindam of his time.


Read Lodder's comment above as that new experiment has to satisfy and
not upset the interests and prejudices of the powers that be. In short,
Lodder types hold theology over science or belief over truth.
Post by J. J. Lodder
The first step in achieving that is to publish it under peer review,
to make it likely that the most obvious errors have been avoided.
Next, if it looks worthwhile, others may try to reproduce it.
If they succeed there may be a possibilty that you are on to something.
Base experience so far: all proposed 'reactionless EM drives'
have been found to be based on erroneous interpretation of experiments.
(on more competent testing)
You have not given any reason for believing yours to be any better.
Jan
J. J. Lodder
2024-10-15 07:55:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Aether Regained
Post by bertietaylor
The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
Arindam Banerjee,
HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne
10 Nov 2023
(All rights reserved)
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ
***
Experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun
http://youtu.be/zYtyOMbgiZ0
Which is improved upon in, and its potential for ejecting matter into
near space , and horizontal tunneling shown in
http://youtu.be/o6pjy0Wvujs
and the following shows how a new class of linear motor violating
inertia can be developed by arresting the momentum of the armature and
imparting that to the whole system, giving it an increased velocity
http://youtu.be/idsIuzEajTc
If the aether is fluid-like, which I believe it to be, as opposed to
your belief that the aether is solid-like, then there is a simple
There is no violation of inertia or conservation-of-momentum in fluid
mechanics: any unseen/unaccounted for momentum is carried away by the fluid!
the aether must be solid-like.
A fluid aether cannot support transversverse waves,
and this is what electromagnetic waves obviously are.
they are bunk, with or without an aether,
Jan
Another e=mcc chap denying reality of inertia violation by Arindam's
rail gun experiment.
Where is this work published (in a serious journal)?
Why bother about journals? Why not look at what has been done?
Because nothing has been done yet.
What a lie. Arindam has been theorising from 1998 and experimenting from
2014. All the relevant information is online. But while the powers that
be will go to the ends of the universe in search of new things they
strenuously fail to notice Arindam.
Of course, nothing to notice there.
(except perhaps amusement value)
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by J. J. Lodder
An experiment isn't an experiment until it has been correctly
interpreted. Your say-so doesn't qualify as correct interpretation.
Arindam's new design rail gun can be compared to the invention of the
telescope. Anyone can see bigly with that. No doubt there. Whether that
disproved the crystal spheres metaphysics was a matter of interest. The
Cardinals thought it did not shatter the spheres. Earth was still and
all above moved in such crystal spheres. Now satellites circling Jupiter
sorta did seem to be sphere-shattering. Not what their Holinesses wanted
to know! So what to do, but persecute Galileo, the Arindam of his time.
50 points on the crackpot index for any comparison of self to Galileo,
or mention of cardinals working on the case. (John Baez)
Post by Bertietaylor
Read Lodder's comment above as that new experiment has to satisfy and
not upset the interests and prejudices of the powers that be. In short,
Lodder types hold theology over science or belief over truth.
To be fair, your works on internal force -are- suitable as excercise
material for bright high school students. ('spot the errors')

Jan
bertietaylor
2024-10-15 08:36:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Aether Regained
Post by bertietaylor
The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
Arindam Banerjee,
HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne
10 Nov 2023
(All rights reserved)
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ
***
Experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun
http://youtu.be/zYtyOMbgiZ0
Which is improved upon in, and its potential for ejecting matter into
near space , and horizontal tunneling shown in
http://youtu.be/o6pjy0Wvujs
and the following shows how a new class of linear motor violating
inertia can be developed by arresting the momentum of the armature and
imparting that to the whole system, giving it an increased velocity
http://youtu.be/idsIuzEajTc
If the aether is fluid-like, which I believe it to be, as opposed to
your belief that the aether is solid-like, then there is a simple
There is no violation of inertia or conservation-of-momentum in fluid
mechanics: any unseen/unaccounted for momentum is carried away by the fluid!
the aether must be solid-like.
A fluid aether cannot support transversverse waves,
and this is what electromagnetic waves obviously are.
they are bunk, with or without an aether,
Jan
Another e=mcc chap denying reality of inertia violation by Arindam's
rail gun experiment.
Where is this work published (in a serious journal)?
Why bother about journals? Why not look at what has been done?
Because nothing has been done yet.
What a lie. Arindam has been theorising from 1998 and experimenting from
2014. All the relevant information is online. But while the powers that
be will go to the ends of the universe in search of new things they
strenuously fail to notice Arindam.
Of course, nothing to notice there.
(except perhaps amusement value)
Everything to ignore, for the e=mcc wallahs.
Hangs them high - metaphorically - the works of Arindam.
Let them laugh while they can.
They have the contempt of the ages to come.
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by J. J. Lodder
An experiment isn't an experiment until it has been correctly
interpreted. Your say-so doesn't qualify as correct interpretation.
Arindam's new design rail gun can be compared to the invention of the
telescope. Anyone can see bigly with that. No doubt there. Whether that
disproved the crystal spheres metaphysics was a matter of interest. The
Cardinals thought it did not shatter the spheres. Earth was still and
all above moved in such crystal spheres. Now satellites circling Jupiter
sorta did seem to be sphere-shattering. Not what their Holinesses wanted
to know! So what to do, but persecute Galileo, the Arindam of his time.
50 points on the crackpot index for any comparison of self to Galileo,
or mention of cardinals working on the case. (John Baez)
Actually Arindam is a greater genius than da Vinci, who was so woefully
wrong about permanent motion machines creating energy out of force. In
fact, Arindam is the greatest genius of all time, and sole god among
lotsa devils in this world of lies, run by liars.

Under Einstein the Dark Age crystal sphere wallahs have made a comeback,
with their nonsense notions of finite expanding universe with Earth as
the centre, big bang theory and for Hell black holes!
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Bertietaylor
Read Lodder's comment above as that new experiment has to satisfy and
not upset the interests and prejudices of the powers that be. In short,
Lodder types hold theology over science or belief over truth.
To be fair, your works on internal force -are- suitable as excercise
material for bright high school students. ('spot the errors')
Without internal force all would be dead.

What fools these apes be!

Woof-woof

Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs)
Post by J. J. Lodder
Jan
Bertietaylor
2024-10-15 04:47:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden
Post by Bertietaylor
Post by J. J. Lodder
Post by Aether Regained
Post by bertietaylor
The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
Arindam Banerjee,
HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne
10 Nov 2023
(All rights reserved)
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ
***
Experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun
http://youtu.be/zYtyOMbgiZ0
Which is improved upon in, and its potential for ejecting matter into
near space , and horizontal tunneling shown in
http://youtu.be/o6pjy0Wvujs
and the following shows how a new class of linear motor violating
inertia can be developed by arresting the momentum of the armature and
imparting that to the whole system, giving it an increased velocity
http://youtu.be/idsIuzEajTc
If the aether is fluid-like, which I believe it to be, as opposed to
your belief that the aether is solid-like, then there is a simple
There is no violation of inertia or conservation-of-momentum in fluid
mechanics: any unseen/unaccounted for momentum is carried away by the fluid!
the aether must be solid-like.
A fluid aether cannot support transversverse waves,
and this is what electromagnetic waves obviously are.
they are bunk, with or without an aether,
Jan
Another e=mcc chap denying reality of inertia violation by Arindam's
rail gun experiment.
Where is this work published (in a serious journal)?
Why bother about journals? Why not look at what has been done?
Because nothing has been done yet.
An experiment isn't an experiment until it has been correctly
interpreted. Your say-so doesn't qualify as correct interpretation.
The first step in achieving that is to publish it under peer review,
Arindam has no peers. People like Newton, Galileo Archimedes,
Bhaskaracharya, Tesla are not to be found any more. Arindam ranks
himself among these sort of people, not with the cowardly careerist
scratching each others' backs while on the lookout for fame and funding
and promotion. In short Arindam is a creative genius, not an academic.
Post by J. J. Lodder
to make it likely that the most obvious errors have been avoided.
Yes it is just here that Arindam's works will be immediately rejected by
esteemed journals on theoretical or rather dogmatic ground by the e=MCC
chanters. Arindam ridicules their dogma so avoidance is his strategy.

So no point trying to get publication in journals.
Not that it is not possible to publish in places by spending a few
thousand dollars. And then the learned ones will say that as it has not
been published in Mature or Science with no scent of a Nobel prize that
paper must be substandard.

Arindam would rather spend that much money on other things.
Post by J. J. Lodder
Next, if it looks worthwhile, others may try to reproduce it.
If they succeed there may be a possibilty that you are on to something.
It already looks more than worthwhile with no need for journal
publication. That the esteemed ones ignore his new, brilliant, useful,
revolutionary works increases Arindam's contempt for them.
Post by J. J. Lodder
Base experience so far: all proposed 'reactionless EM drives'
have been found to be based on erroneous interpretation of experiments.
Has Arindam's experiment been repeated with Arindam's involvement? NO.
So Lodder's point is irrelevant.
Post by J. J. Lodder
(on more competent testing)
You have not given any reason for believing yours to be any better.
Typical lie.
But at least they are not denying that Arindam has made a working model
of an electromagnetic rail gun.

What fools these apes be!

Woof-woof

Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs)
Post by J. J. Lodder
Jan
Bertietaylor
2024-10-13 00:46:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Aether Regained
Post by bertietaylor
The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
Arindam Banerjee,
HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne
10 Nov 2023
(All rights reserved)
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ
***
Experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun
http://youtu.be/zYtyOMbgiZ0
Which is improved upon in, and its potential for ejecting matter into
near space , and horizontal tunneling shown in
http://youtu.be/o6pjy0Wvujs
and the following shows how a new class of linear motor violating
inertia can be developed by arresting the momentum of the armature and
imparting that to the whole system, giving it an increased velocity
http://youtu.be/idsIuzEajTc
That is the third person dogvoice perfectly wonderful for propaganda
purposes. We cyberdoggies influence Arindam from our spiritual
dimension.

Yes it is necessary for first person Arindamvoice will make his mere
undeniable truths sound like the imaginative Baron Von Munchausen tales.
Post by Aether Regained
If the aether is fluid-like, which I believe it to be,
No it is NOT fluid like as per aether theory. It is an infinitely
elastic solid meaning that all aetheric components maintain their
respective positions wrt each other.


as opposed to
Post by Aether Regained
your belief that the aether is solid-like, then there is a simple
It is not Arindam's belief but 19th century physicists' theory.
Post by Aether Regained
There is no violation of inertia or conservation-of-momentum in fluid
mechanics: any unseen/unaccounted for momentum is carried away by the fluid!
Maybe but point is that with internal force the body accelerates
linearly violating the classical notion of inertia.

Rotational inertia is no longer any valid concept with starter motors.
Loading...