The definition of "when"

[Maciej Wozniak]

Define "when" please. We can. You haven't.

You say you can. I say you're lying, as
expected from a poor relativistic stinker.

Let's check. Will we?
Let S - a satalite of GPS. One, chosen.
B - a GPS ground base. One, chosen.
ES, EB - sets of events in S,B
e1 - an event from ES, e2 - an event from EB.

Propose a method of determining whether
e1 and e2 are simultaneous - according to
an observer from B. A method, of course,
fitting The Shit you worship.

Will I have to apologize for "you're lying",
poor stinker?

[Maciej Wozniak]

Post by Maciej Wozniak

Define "when" please. We can. You haven't.

You say you can. I say you're lying, as
expected from a poor relativistic stinker.
Let's check. Will we?
Let S - a satalite of GPS. One, chosen.
B - a GPS ground base. One, chosen.
ES, EB - sets of events  in S,B
e1 - an event from ES, e2 - an event from EB.
Propose a method of determining whether
e1 and e2 are simultaneous - according to
an observer from B. A method, of course,
fitting The Shit you worship.
Will I have to apologize for "you're lying",
poor stinker?

No answer? Of course.

[The Starmaker]

Post by Maciej Wozniak

Post by Maciej Wozniak

Define "when" please. We can. You haven't.

You say you can. I say you're lying, as
expected from a poor relativistic stinker.
Let's check. Will we?
Let S - a satalite of GPS. One, chosen.
B - a GPS ground base. One, chosen.
ES, EB - sets of events in S,B
e1 - an event from ES, e2 - an event from EB.
Propose a method of determining whether
e1 and e2 are simultaneous - according to
an observer from B. A method, of course,
fitting The Shit you worship.
Will I have to apologize for "you're lying",
poor stinker?

No answer? Of course.

you said when, but you didn't say when.

[Maciej Wozniak]

Post by The Starmaker

Post by Maciej Wozniak

Post by Maciej Wozniak

Define "when" please. We can. You haven't.

You say you can. I say you're lying, as
expected from a poor relativistic stinker.
Let's check. Will we?
Let S - a satalite of GPS. One, chosen.
B - a GPS ground base. One, chosen.
ES, EB - sets of events in S,B
e1 - an event from ES, e2 - an event from EB.
Propose a method of determining whether
e1 and e2 are simultaneous - according to
an observer from B. A method, of course,
fitting The Shit you worship.
Will I have to apologize for "you're lying",
poor stinker?

No answer? Of course.

you said when, but you didn't say when.

It was not me saying "when". And, well,
words can be often replaced by similar
ones. When P said "we can define "when""
he meant their pathetic "definition" of
simultaneity, as absurd as useless.