Discussion:
The Moral Duty of a Skeptic
(too old to reply)
LaurenceClarkCrossen
2024-10-30 04:08:24 UTC
Permalink
Massimo Pigliucci's article, "The Moral Duty of a Skeptic" [Skeptical
Inquirer vol 33 No. 6 Nov/Dec 2009 says: "that one should suspend
judgements on all matters because there is no guaranteed path to
absolute truth." - citing Aenesidemus first cebtury BCE.
Bertietaylor
2024-10-30 06:32:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by LaurenceClarkCrossen
Massimo Pigliucci's article, "The Moral Duty of a Skeptic" [Skeptical
Inquirer vol 33 No. 6 Nov/Dec 2009 says: "that one should suspend
judgements on all matters because there is no guaranteed path to
absolute truth." - citing Aenesidemus first cebtury BCE.
If Pig* gets a powerful kick on his rear what sort of truth would he
consider that to be?
LaurenceClarkCrossen
2024-10-30 19:15:40 UTC
Permalink
Bertie: I don't think he would blame Arindam if Bertie were to make a
pointless attempt at a rhetorical question.
bertietaylor
2024-10-31 00:00:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by LaurenceClarkCrossen
Bertie: I don't think he would blame Arindam if Bertie were to make a
pointless attempt at a rhetorical question.
Depends upon the physical or theoretical application.

Those on sinecure or rents prefer theory over practice.

Loading...