Discussion:
Fraud and physics
Add Reply
Richard Hertz
2021-11-18 21:50:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
The Oxford English Dictionary defines “fraud” as “the using of false
representations to obtain an unjust advantage or to injure the rights or interests of another.”

In the Anglo-American common law, a “false representation” can take many forms, including:

1. A false statement of fact, known to be false at the time it was made;

- After many years of effort, and using a lot of money, we've detected
gravitational waves. Two of them, actually (LIGO's teamwork).

- After many years of effort, and using a lot of money, we've detected the
particle of God. Three of them, actually, and much heavier than what we
thought, but it's OK anyway. Nobel for anyone? (LHC's teamwork).

- After many years of effort, and using a lot of money, we've measured the
entire spectrum of the MBR, and it fits 100% with Planck's equation for
Black Body Cavity, developed in 1900. It's the most accurate measurement
ever made and a definite proof of the Big Bang. (NASA teamwork).

2. A statement of fact with no reasonable basis to make that statement;

- I've calculated the exact deviation of a beam of star's light, when pass by
the surface of the Sun and to be proven in three years by Eddington, my
homo partner. It's twice the value that I calculated only 4 years ago, with
the help of my friend von Soldner, and is of 1.75" (Einstein's teamwork).

3. A promise of future performance made with an intent, at the time the
promise was made, not to perform as promised;

- In two years, I'll deliver a theory that explains: the advance of Mercury's
perihelion, the deflection of light by gravity, the alteration of time due to
gravity, the change of the speed of light due to gravity, the red-shifting
of life due to gravity and stuff. (Einstein's teamwork, 1911).

4. An expression of opinion that is false, made by one claiming or implying
to have special knowledge of the subject matter of the opinion—where
“special knowledge” means knowledge or information superior to that
possessed by the other party, and to which the other party did not have
equal access.

- These equations prove that physical 3D space bends under massive
celestial bodies but I'm sorry to comment that only 12 persons in the
world understand them. This will be true forever, for instance in 2021.
By then, 12,000 persons will claim that they understand them, but it has
proven by the many authors that such thing is impossible.
(Einstein's teamwork, 1919).
Odd Bodkin
2021-11-18 21:57:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Richard Hertz
The Oxford English Dictionary defines “fraud” as “the using of false
representations to obtain an unjust advantage or to injure the rights or
interests of another.”
1. A false statement of fact, known to be false at the time it was made;
- After many years of effort, and using a lot of money, we've detected
gravitational waves. Two of them, actually (LIGO's teamwork).
- After many years of effort, and using a lot of money, we've detected the
particle of God. Three of them, actually, and much heavier than what we
thought, but it's OK anyway. Nobel for anyone? (LHC's teamwork).
- After many years of effort, and using a lot of money, we've measured the
entire spectrum of the MBR, and it fits 100% with Planck's equation for
Black Body Cavity, developed in 1900. It's the most accurate measurement
ever made and a definite proof of the Big Bang. (NASA teamwork).
2. A statement of fact with no reasonable basis to make that statement;
- I've calculated the exact deviation of a beam of star's light, when pass by
the surface of the Sun and to be proven in three years by Eddington, my
homo partner. It's twice the value that I calculated only 4 years ago, with
the help of my friend von Soldner, and is of 1.75" (Einstein's teamwork).
3. A promise of future performance made with an intent, at the time the
promise was made, not to perform as promised;
- In two years, I'll deliver a theory that explains: the advance of Mercury's
perihelion, the deflection of light by gravity, the alteration of time due to
gravity, the change of the speed of light due to gravity, the red-shifting
of life due to gravity and stuff. (Einstein's teamwork, 1911).
4. An expression of opinion that is false, made by one claiming or implying
to have special knowledge of the subject matter of the opinion—where
“special knowledge” means knowledge or information superior to that
possessed by the other party, and to which the other party did not have
equal access.
- These equations prove that physical 3D space bends under massive
celestial bodies but I'm sorry to comment that only 12 persons in the
world understand them. This will be true forever, for instance in 2021.
By then, 12,000 persons will claim that they understand them, but it has
proven by the many authors that such thing is impossible.
(Einstein's teamwork, 1919).
Isn’t it interesting that you post about fraud while exemplifying it in
your depiction of history?

What do you enjoy so much about spin-doctoring? Did you find it useful
during your engineering career? Did you admire Morton Thiokol for their
efforts at it?
--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Dono.
2021-11-18 22:05:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
snip cretinisms<
Arnold Sala
2021-11-18 22:52:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Richard Hertz
The Oxford English Dictionary defines “fraud” as “the using of false
representations to obtain an unjust advantage or to injure the rights or
interests of another.”
In the Anglo-American common law, a “false representation” can take many
1. A false statement of fact, known to be false at the time it was made;
absolutely, you clearly can see their medicinal papers, evaluated by
experts, as 96% false crackpotery, you just think how wrong Einstine's
papers are.
Paparios
2021-11-19 00:12:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Arnold Sala
absolutely, you clearly can see their medicinal papers, evaluated by
experts, as 96% false crackpotery, you just think how wrong Einstine's
papers are.
Cooking results, fudging developments, total or partial plagiarism, intention to deceive, etc. are methods present in EVERY
HUMAN ACTIVITY, because the problem is within some flawed human beings.
But according to this forum, physicists and mathematicians ARE THE EXCEPTION TO THE RULE. Even chemistry is also in the bag.
What a load of BS you write here. In every human activity there are good guys and bad guys and neither physicists , mathematicians and chemestry fellows are free of that characteristic. We cherised Galileo, Newton and Einstein, among others, because their contribution to the advance of physics was fundamental. However none of them were free of making mistakes and, for sure, they did do wrong things.
Physicists and mathematicians NEVER DO WRONG. The problem is you, that didn't effort enough to GRASP the concepts and then
UNDERSTAND THEM while entering in a charming state of delight (Einstein dixit (latin), 11 Nov 1915).
Clearly that is not the case. A lot of proposed physics models have vanished into oblivion without making too much noise.

Your fixation in Einstein, as a sort of maximum devil, is clearly a matter for your shrink to study in order to help you.
JanPB
2021-11-19 08:47:55 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Richard Hertz
<snip>
Post by Arnold Sala
Post by Richard Hertz
In the Anglo-American common law, a “false representation” can take many
1. A false statement of fact, known to be false at the time it was made;
absolutely, you clearly can see their medicinal papers, evaluated by
experts, as 96% false crackpotery, you just think how wrong Einstine's
papers are.
Cooking results, fudging developments, total or partial plagiarism, intention to deceive, etc. are methods present in EVERY
HUMAN ACTIVITY, because the problem is within some flawed human beings.
Sure. They just weren't present in the development of relativity.
Post by Richard Hertz
But according to this forum, physicists and mathematicians ARE THE EXCEPTION TO THE RULE. Even chemistry is also in the bag.
No, that's not "according to this forum", it's a strawman.
Post by Richard Hertz
Physicists and mathematicians NEVER DO WRONG.
A strawman.
Post by Richard Hertz
The problem is you, that didn't effort enough to GRASP the concepts and then
UNDERSTAND THEM while entering in a charming state of delight (Einstein dixit (latin), 11 Nov 1915).
You certainly didn't grasp them. The only way to fix this is for you to
stop screaming complete idiocies 24/7 and start learning.

There is no other way, no matter how much you thrash about.

--
Jan
Arnold Sala
2021-11-19 17:38:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by JanPB
The problem is you, that didn't effort enough to GRASP the concepts and
then UNDERSTAND THEM while entering in a charming state of delight
(Einstein dixit (latin), 11 Nov 1915).
You certainly didn't grasp them. The only way to fix this is for you to
stop screaming complete idiocies 24/7 and start learning.
There is no other way, no matter how much you thrash about.
false, Einstine was a perimeter institute from 1933, evading the
reconstruction of his home country, for which he didn't fight to support,
or to defend going to war.
Thomas Heger
2021-11-20 07:33:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Arnold Sala
Post by JanPB
The problem is you, that didn't effort enough to GRASP the concepts and
then UNDERSTAND THEM while entering in a charming state of delight
(Einstein dixit (latin), 11 Nov 1915).
You certainly didn't grasp them. The only way to fix this is for you to
stop screaming complete idiocies 24/7 and start learning.
There is no other way, no matter how much you thrash about.
false, Einstine was a perimeter institute from 1933, evading the
reconstruction of his home country, for which he didn't fight to support,
or to defend going to war.
No. Einstein was born in Germany, but was a Swiss citizen. And the Swiss
didn't participate in WWII.

Befor that he went to Italy and lived there for a while with his
parents, which openend a business in Padua. Possible he became an
Italian citizen, too, before becoming a swiss citizen.

Later he became an US citizen and also a citizen of Israel.

If he could be conscripted, than only by the US forces, because he was
US citizen at that time and lived in the USA.

The Germans after 1933 didn't want him back and had no means to for
conscription of former citzens.


TH
Thomas Heger
2021-11-21 07:22:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Thomas Heger
Post by Arnold Sala
false, Einstine was a perimeter institute from 1933, evading the
reconstruction of his home country, for which he didn't fight to
support, or to defend going to war.
No. Einstein was born in Germany, but was a Swiss citizen. And the Swiss
didn't participate in WWII.
nonsense, you are only true citizen in the country of birth. Giving him
education, food, water and so on.
This rule is only applicable in certain countries and Germany was not
among these.

So, it is and was possible to aquirre and to give up German citizenship.

But according to German laws, you can only have one citizenship, because
you cannot possibly follow the orders of two different kings.

Other countries have different laws, which follow different legal
principles.

TH
Wilm Dulin
2021-11-21 13:52:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Thomas Heger
This rule is only applicable in certain countries and Germany was not
among these.
So, it is and was possible to aquirre and to give up German citizenship.
But according to German laws, you can only have one citizenship, because
you cannot possibly follow the orders of two different kings.
Other countries have different laws, which follow different legal
principles.
intriguing. It's NOT a "vaccine", but a *genetic_synthetic_pathogen*
(makes you sick). Calling it a "vaccine" makes you stupid, and wrong.

DR DAVID MARTIN - THIS IS NOT A VACCINE - WATCH TO SEE WHAT THEY'RE
GIVING YOU https://www.bitchute.com/video/or5kdfK3mKr8/
Wilm Dulin
2021-11-21 15:08:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
I don't think, he wanted to give up any of his passports and kept the
rights of entry and permenent residency in all of these countries.
That was illegal in Germany, hence he had given up German citizenship,
but not Swiss, Hungary, US and Israel (possibly he had Italian
citizenship, too).
KLAUS SCHWAB'S SCHOOL FOR COVID DICTATORS TRAINED TO SERVE CABAL'S ORDERS
(Pt 2) https://www.bitchute.com/video/Cgkut0hFZjGx/

about 1300 "leaders". Including military. This fascist world is fucked.
So it's not ONLY the big-pharma and bill gaytes, but mainly the deadly
globalist fascist WEF, the "world economic forum". In this aspect is a
war between the the people, unorganized, say in communist, socialist etc
parties, unions etc, and the global fascist force, making the whole thing
the /* biggest_war_ever_existent_on_this_capitalist_planet */.
Wilm Dulin
2021-11-21 15:20:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
I don't think, he wanted to give up any of his passports and kept the
rights of entry and permenent residency in all of these countries.
That was illegal in Germany, hence he had given up German citizenship,
but not Swiss, Hungary, US and Israel (possibly he had Italian
citizenship, too).
How is it that more than 190 governments from all over the world ended up
dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic in almost exactly the same manner,
with lockdowns, mask mandates, and vaccination cards now being
commonplace everywhere? The answer may lie in the Young Global Leaders
school, which was established and managed by Klaus Schwab of the World
Economic Forum, and that many of today’s prominent political and business
leaders passed through on their way to the top.

The German economist, journalist, and author Ernst Wolff has revealed
some facts about Schwab’s “Young Global Leaders” school that are relevant
for understanding world events during the pandemic in a video from the
German Corona Committee podcast. While Wolff is mainly known as a critic
of the globalist financial system, recently he has focused on bringing to
light what he sees as the hidden agenda behind the anti-Covid measures
being enacted around the world.

KLAUS SCHWAB'S SCHOOL FOR COVID DICTATORS TRAINED TO SERVE CABAL'S ORDERS
(Pt 2) https://www.bitchute.com/video/Cgkut0hFZjGx/

about 1300 "leaders". Including military. This fascist world is fucked. So
it's not ONLY the big-pharma and bill gaytes, but mainly the deadly
globalist fascist WEF, the "world economic forum". In this aspect is a war
between the the people, unorganized, say in communist, socialist etc
parties, unions etc, and the global fascist force, making the whole thing
the /* biggest_war_ever_existent_on_this_capitalist_planet */.
Thomas Heger
2021-11-22 07:27:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Wilm Dulin
I don't think, he wanted to give up any of his passports and kept the
rights of entry and permenent residency in all of these countries.
That was illegal in Germany, hence he had given up German citizenship,
but not Swiss, Hungary, US and Israel (possibly he had Italian
citizenship, too).
How is it that more than 190 governments from all over the world ended up
dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic in almost exactly the same manner,
with lockdowns, mask mandates, and vaccination cards now being
commonplace everywhere? The answer may lie in the Young Global Leaders
school, which was established and managed by Klaus Schwab of the World
Economic Forum, and that many of today’s prominent political and business
leaders passed through on their way to the top.
The German economist, journalist, and author Ernst Wolff has revealed
some facts about Schwab’s “Young Global Leaders” school that are relevant
for understanding world events during the pandemic in a video from the
German Corona Committee podcast. While Wolff is mainly known as a critic
of the globalist financial system, recently he has focused on bringing to
light what he sees as the hidden agenda behind the anti-Covid measures
being enacted around the world.
This is totally off topic here.

At least you should have left a usable link like this one

https://rairfoundation.com/exposed-klaus-schwabs-school-for-covid-dictators-plan-for-great-reset-videos/
Dono.
2021-11-21 17:30:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Thomas Heger
Post by Arnold Sala
Post by JanPB
The problem is you, that didn't effort enough to GRASP the concepts and
then UNDERSTAND THEM while entering in a charming state of delight
(Einstein dixit (latin), 11 Nov 1915).
You certainly didn't grasp them. The only way to fix this is for you to
stop screaming complete idiocies 24/7 and start learning.
There is no other way, no matter how much you thrash about.
false, Einstine was a perimeter institute from 1933, evading the
reconstruction of his home country, for which he didn't fight to support,
or to defend going to war.
No. Einstein was born in Germany, but was a Swiss citizen. And the Swiss
didn't participate in WWII.
Befor that he went to Italy and lived there for a while with his
parents, which openend a business in Padua. Possible he became an
Italian citizen, too, before becoming a swiss citizen.
Later he became an US citizen and also a citizen of Israel.
If he could be conscripted, than only by the US forces, because he was
US citizen at that time and lived in the USA.
The Germans after 1933 didn't want him back and had no means to for
conscription of former citzens.
TH
1879 - 1902: German citizen
1902 - 1911: Swiss citizen
1911 - 1912: Austro-Hungary citizen (forced by law, to access to a professorship at Prague)
1912 - Feb 1914: Nationless citizen, stranded at Zurich
Mar 1914 - Mid 1933: German citizen again (forced by law, to access to a professorship at Berlin)
Mid 1933 - 1938: Nationless citizen again, as he delivered his passport to Germany Embassy at Denmark.
1938 - 1955: US citizen
1948 - 1955: Dual citizenship, US and Israel
"Einstein was a citizen of three countries. He was a German citizen by birth but gave up his citizenship in 1896 because he
despised Germany's militarism. He became a Swiss citizen in 1901. In 1933, he moved to the United States to flee the Nazis,
and he became a U.S. citizen in 1940."
I don't think, he wanted to give up any of his passports and kept the
rights of entry and permenent residency in all of these countries.
That was illegal in Germany, hence he had given up German citizenship,
but not Swiss, Hungary, US and Israel (possibly he had Italian
citizenship, too).
TH
Nazi piece of shit,

Einstein had only two citizenships after giving up the German one : Swiss and US
Thomas Heger
2021-11-22 07:41:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Thomas Heger
Post by Arnold Sala
Post by JanPB
The problem is you, that didn't effort enough to GRASP the concepts and
then UNDERSTAND THEM while entering in a charming state of delight
(Einstein dixit (latin), 11 Nov 1915).
You certainly didn't grasp them. The only way to fix this is for you to
stop screaming complete idiocies 24/7 and start learning.
There is no other way, no matter how much you thrash about.
false, Einstine was a perimeter institute from 1933, evading the
reconstruction of his home country, for which he didn't fight to support,
or to defend going to war.
No. Einstein was born in Germany, but was a Swiss citizen. And the Swiss
didn't participate in WWII.
Befor that he went to Italy and lived there for a while with his
parents, which openend a business in Padua. Possible he became an
Italian citizen, too, before becoming a swiss citizen.
Later he became an US citizen and also a citizen of Israel.
If he could be conscripted, than only by the US forces, because he was
US citizen at that time and lived in the USA.
The Germans after 1933 didn't want him back and had no means to for
conscription of former citzens.
TH
1879 - 1902: German citizen
1902 - 1911: Swiss citizen
1911 - 1912: Austro-Hungary citizen (forced by law, to access to a professorship at Prague)
1912 - Feb 1914: Nationless citizen, stranded at Zurich
Mar 1914 - Mid 1933: German citizen again (forced by law, to access to a professorship at Berlin)
Mid 1933 - 1938: Nationless citizen again, as he delivered his passport to Germany Embassy at Denmark.
To return your passport to your embassy does not make you nationless.

As far as I know, citizenship has no 'opt-out option'.

You can can go abroad and never return. If you have no new citzenship,
then you are essentailly nationless.

But I, as a German, cannot 'opt out of citizenship' just by returning my
passport.

It is actually necessary to become a refuge first and to leave the own
country, to become nationless.
1938 - 1955: US citizen
He was in wartime a former German in the USA, which were either
conscipted or put into internment camp.

Apparently Einstein wasn't neither conscripted nor interned into a camp.

At least he was NOT a conscrtiption dodger, because he had US
citizenship at the time of WWII, hence had to fight in the US army, not
in the German.
1948 - 1955: Dual citizenship, US and Israel
The Isrealis offered him also presidency, even if he had not lived there.
JanPB
2021-11-22 23:30:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Arnold Sala
Post by JanPB
The problem is you, that didn't effort enough to GRASP the concepts and
then UNDERSTAND THEM while entering in a charming state of delight
(Einstein dixit (latin), 11 Nov 1915).
You certainly didn't grasp them. The only way to fix this is for you to
stop screaming complete idiocies 24/7 and start learning.
There is no other way, no matter how much you thrash about.
false, Einstine
Who/what is "Einstine"?
Post by Arnold Sala
was a perimeter institute from 1933, evading the
reconstruction of his home country, for which he didn't fight to support,
or to defend going to war.
Word salad.

--
Jan
Kip Foh
2021-11-23 00:33:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by JanPB
Post by Arnold Sala
false, Einstine
Who/what is "Einstine"?
Post by Arnold Sala
was a perimeter institute from 1933, evading the reconstruction of his
home country, for which he didn't fight to support,
or to defend going to war.
Word salad.
🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴
🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🔴🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴
🔴🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴🔴
🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴
🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴
🔴🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🔴🔴
🔴🔴🌕🌕🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴
🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🔴
🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴
🔴🔴🔴🔴🌕🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴
🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴
🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴
🔴🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴🌕🌕🔴🔴
🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴
JanPB
2021-11-25 03:42:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Kip Foh
Post by JanPB
Post by Arnold Sala
false, Einstine
Who/what is "Einstine"?
Post by Arnold Sala
was a perimeter institute from 1933, evading the reconstruction of his
home country, for which he didn't fight to support,
or to defend going to war.
Word salad.
🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴
🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🔴🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴
🔴🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴🔴
🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴
🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴
🔴🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🔴🔴
🔴🔴🌕🌕🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴
🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🔴
🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴
🔴🔴🔴🔴🌕🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴
🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴
🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴
🔴🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴🌕🌕🔴🔴
🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴
Meanwhile: https://www.y
Brain Hubbs
2021-11-25 22:51:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Kip Foh
Post by JanPB
Post by Arnold Sala
was a perimeter institute from 1933, evading the reconstruction of
his home country, for which he didn't fight to support,
or to defend going to war.
Word salad.
🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴
🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🔴🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴
🔴🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴🔴
🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴
🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴
🔴🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🔴🔴
🔴🔴🌕🌕🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴
🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🔴
🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴
🔴🔴🔴🔴🌕🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴
🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴
🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴
🔴🌕🌕🔴🔴🔴🌕🌕🌕🔴🔴🌕🌕🔴🔴
🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴
Meanwhile:

meanwhile up till 1980 all railroads eastern europe were electrified 80%.
Also, in capitalist america the capitalist are teaching students to eat
human flesh, ie kids from capitalist china.

PROJECT EAT HUMAN BABIES TO SOLVE WORLD HUNGER- CANNIBALISM TO GO
MAINSTREAM IN SCHOOLS (PURE EVIL)
https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=Y6Y313YOYH79

Paul Alsing
2021-11-19 05:51:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Richard Hertz
- In two years, I'll deliver a theory that explains: the advance of Mercury's
perihelion, the deflection of light by gravity, the alteration of time due to
gravity, the change of the speed of light due to gravity, the red-shifting
of life due to gravity and stuff. (Einstein's teamwork, 1911).
What a load of crap! If you were a stock I would sell you short and make a fortune!
Richard Hertz
2021-11-19 06:29:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
<snip>
Post by Paul Alsing
What a load of crap! If you were a stock I would sell you short and make a fortune!
And who would borrow you the money in order to buy the stock, because you are not going to use your own, isn't it?

I see your short selling beforehand, because you are an idiot that can't hide traces, so I call a put action on the stock, then
I make public that I'm retiring and you are done. Kiss your assets goodbye.

I'll profit more than proving Einstein wrong, which is going to happen here any moment now.

Wait, it's coming.

You'll see what A FRAUD IS.
Richard Hertz
2021-11-19 08:02:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
This a recent example of a physicist cooking and fudging results, to gain even more recognition. A young Einstein of these times.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sch%C3%B6n_scandal

Excerpts:

The Schön scandal concerns German physicist Jan Hendrik Schön (born August 1970 in Verden an der Aller, Lower Saxony, Germany) who briefly rose to prominence after a series of apparent breakthroughs with semiconductors that were later discovered to be fraudulent.[1] Before he was exposed, Schön had received the Otto-Klung-Weberbank Prize for Physics and the Braunschweig Prize in 2001, as well as the Outstanding Young Investigator Award of the Materials Research Society in 2002, both of which were later rescinded.[2][dubious – discuss]

The scandal provoked discussion in the scientific community about the degree of responsibility of coauthors and reviewers of scientific articles. The debate centered on whether peer review, traditionally designed to find errors and determine relevance and originality of articles, should also be required to detect deliberate fraud.

...............

Schön's field of research was condensed matter physics and nanotechnology.
...........
In 2001 he was listed as an author on an average of one newly published research paper every eight days.[3] In that year he announced in Nature that he had produced a transistor on the molecular scale. Schön claimed to have used a thin layer of organic dye molecules to assemble an electric circuit that, when acted on by an electric current, behaved as a transistor. The implications of his work were significant. It would have been the beginning of a move away from silicon-based electronics and towards organic electronics. It would have allowed chips to continue shrinking past the point at which silicon breaks down, and therefore continue Moore's law for much longer than is currently predicted. It also would have drastically reduced the cost of electronics.
............
A key element in Schön's claimed successful observation of various physical phenomena in organic materials was in the transistor setup, specifically, a thin layer of aluminium oxide, which Schön incorporated in the transistors using lab-facilities of the University of Konstanz in Germany. Although the equipment and materials used were commonly used by laboratories all over the world, no one succeeded in preparing aluminium oxide layers of similar quality as claimed by Schön.[4]
...........
As recounted by Dan Agin in his book Junk Science, soon after Schön published his work on single-molecule semiconductors, others in the physics community alleged that his data contained anomalies. Julia Hsu and Lynn Loo originally noticed issues with Schön's paper describing the assembly of molecular transistors whilst attempting to patent research on lithography, realising by accident that Schön had duplicated figures.
...........
In May 2002, Bell Labs set up a committee to investigate, with Malcolm Beasley from Stanford University as chair.[7] The committee obtained information from all of Schön's coauthors and interviewed the three principal ones (Zhenan Bao, Bertram Batlogg and Christian Kloc).[8] It examined electronic drafts of the disputed articles, which included processed numeric data. The committee requested copies of the raw data, but found that Schön had kept no laboratory notebooks. His raw-data files had been erased from his computer. According to Schön, the files were erased because his computer had limited hard-drive space. In addition, all of his experimental samples had been discarded or damaged beyond repair.
..........
The report found that all of the misdeeds had been performed by Schön alone. All of the coauthors (including Bertram Batlogg, who was the head of the team) were exonerated of scientific misconduct. This sparked widespread debate[9] in the scientific community on how the blame for misconduct should be shared among co-authors, particularly when they share a significant part of the credit.
..........
Schön returned to Germany and took a job at an engineering firm.[10]

In June 2004 the University of Konstanz issued a press release stating that Schön's doctoral degree had been revoked due to "dishonourable conduct". Department of Physics spokesman Wolfgang Dieterich called the affair the "biggest fraud in physics in the last 50 years" and said that the "credibility of science had been brought into disrepute".[11] Schön appealed the ruling, but on October 28, 2009, it was upheld by the university.
--------------------------------------

NOTE FOR SOME ASSHOLES HERE: EINSTEIN BURNED EVERY FUCKING PIECE OF PAPER THAT COULD FRAME HIM.
AFTER 1905, AFTER 1914 AND, PARTICULARLY, AFTER 1 DEC 1915.

The notebooks and manuscripts currently available online come from a careful and intelligent crook, who really knew how to cheat.

The recently published Besso-Manuscript can be shown because, even if them show the pair as DUMB AND DUMBER, it's spin doctored
(thanks Bodkin) to make them appear as a legitimate, even wrong, stop in the journey toward 1915 GR.

The point is: Why Besso hide it for 40 years, until his death? What obscure purpose was behind such action? In 1945 the WWII had ended,
so WHY the soul brother Besso kept it in silence another 10 years? Money? Resentment? Fear of .....?.

I never stated that the IMBECILE CRETIN EINSTEIN was actually an idiot, in terms of SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE.

He had witty and charming talks with others. He always kept a list of "one liners" to deliver as gems of wisdom.

But he was a crook and a sociopath, willing to do WHATEVER IT TOOK to gain fame, recognition, money and influence.

He was the Master of Deception. Really. His abilities in the art of sophistry and the art of conceal the truth saying something fallacious at
the right time or, on the contrary, NOT SAYING anything and claiming: As it can be seen; Obviously, the result is; I rearranged things at my
convenience to obtain this new form; Hereby we can with reasonable accuracy replace it with; etc, etc, etc.

It takes the effort to read the ORIGINAL PAPERS (not translations), to appreciate how the MASTER operated within 1905 - 1915.

He went FULL RETARDED after Dec. 1915, so it means that the Puppet Masters behind him cut the strings and let him on the loose.

Just check his "productions" from 1916 to 1954 to appreciate equally a magnificent sophist and a magnificent imbecile.

Soon I'll publish here a proof of his DECEPTION AND FRAUD, very much like the way the new cretin, at the origin of this post, operated.

In fact, it's the similarity between the presentation of GR and this paper is what moved to write this post.

Notice that, like the cretin Einstein, this one delivered TONS of papers to be published (many with co-authors). It is said that one per week,
during a climax.

I can find more examples of FRAUD IN PHYSICS. In this case, this modern Einstein played with the WRONG PEOPLE: AT&T and the entire
semiconductor's industry.
JanPB
2021-11-19 08:48:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Richard Hertz
This a recent example of a physicist cooking and fudging results, to gain even more recognition. A young Einstein of these times.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sch%C3%B6n_scandal
Fascinating but irrelevant.

--
Jan
Dono.
2021-11-19 16:05:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
poisonous spittle snipped<
You are frothing at the mouth. We reduced you to spewing insults, you are unraveling quite fast.
Dono.
2021-11-19 16:51:25 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Richard Hertz
<snip>
Post by Dono.
You are frothing at the mouth. We reduced you to spewing insults, you are unraveling quite fast.
Actually, I am a Republican, imbecile. Keep on frothing at the mouth but be careful, one day you will choke on your own bile.
Odd Bodkin
2021-11-19 16:29:07 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Richard Hertz
<snip>
Post by JanPB
Fascinating but irrelevant.
--
Jan
Only a relativity fanatic and also an imbecile can say that this proven
case of FRAUD AT HIGH LEVEL in modern physics
is IRRELEVANT!
Only a fanatic would insist that fraud and deception is so rampant a human
condition that a SINGLE CASE of fraud is sufficient to prove that the whole
field is corrupt. Only a fanatic would insist that the claim that
relativity did not exhibit this is tantamount to immaculate perfection of
its proponents. Only a fanatic would say it’s one or the other: total
abject corruption or blameless and faultless perfection.

Can you please try to be just a tiny bit less of an ass, Richard?
Post by Richard Hertz
It was a case that has shown how the entire physics establishment in
western countries is ROTTEN TO THE CORE, and only
because it affected ECONOMIC and STRATEGIC interests, it became public so
Don't fuck with our INTERESTS or we are going to make you a "MORTO CIVILE".
Thanks to SOB like you, CRIME PROGRESS.
You should be ASHAMED for denying the importance of this FRAUD.
I'm now convinced that YOU APPROVE OTHER TYPES OF CRIMES, if they go
along with you AGENDA. You are despicable!
--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Richard Hertz
2021-11-19 16:42:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Odd Bodkin
Post by Richard Hertz
<snip>
Post by JanPB
Fascinating but irrelevant.
--
Jan
Only a relativity fanatic and also an imbecile can say that this proven
case of FRAUD AT HIGH LEVEL in modern physics
is IRRELEVANT!
Only a fanatic would insist that fraud and deception is so rampant a human
condition that a SINGLE CASE of fraud is sufficient to prove that the whole
field is corrupt. Only a fanatic would insist that the claim that
relativity did not exhibit this is tantamount to immaculate perfection of
its proponents. Only a fanatic would say it’s one or the other: total
abject corruption or blameless and faultless perfection.
Can you please try to be just a tiny bit less of an ass, Richard?
Post by Richard Hertz
It was a case that has shown how the entire physics establishment in
western countries is ROTTEN TO THE CORE, and only
because it affected ECONOMIC and STRATEGIC interests, it became public so
Don't fuck with our INTERESTS or we are going to make you a "MORTO CIVILE".
Thanks to SOB like you, CRIME PROGRESS.
You should be ASHAMED for denying the importance of this FRAUD.
I'm now convinced that YOU APPROVE OTHER TYPES OF CRIMES, if they go
along with you AGENDA. You are despicable!
--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
You are covering up the subject, and also insult anyone's intelligence: I wrote about this case as AN EXAMPLE.

It was the first one that appeared by googling "fraud in physics".

I had no intention to make a LIST, which I have no doubt that would contain 20 cases with little effort searching.

But it WAS NOT my intention, and you are abusing of it with your WEAK and FALLACIOUS rhetoric.

Do you the job. I have enough with Einstein, the evil crook.
Odd Bodkin
2021-11-19 17:32:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Richard Hertz
Post by Odd Bodkin
Post by Richard Hertz
<snip>
Post by JanPB
Fascinating but irrelevant.
--
Jan
Only a relativity fanatic and also an imbecile can say that this proven
case of FRAUD AT HIGH LEVEL in modern physics
is IRRELEVANT!
Only a fanatic would insist that fraud and deception is so rampant a human
condition that a SINGLE CASE of fraud is sufficient to prove that the whole
field is corrupt. Only a fanatic would insist that the claim that
relativity did not exhibit this is tantamount to immaculate perfection of
its proponents. Only a fanatic would say it’s one or the other: total
abject corruption or blameless and faultless perfection.
Can you please try to be just a tiny bit less of an ass, Richard?
Post by Richard Hertz
It was a case that has shown how the entire physics establishment in
western countries is ROTTEN TO THE CORE, and only
because it affected ECONOMIC and STRATEGIC interests, it became public so
Don't fuck with our INTERESTS or we are going to make you a "MORTO CIVILE".
Thanks to SOB like you, CRIME PROGRESS.
You should be ASHAMED for denying the importance of this FRAUD.
I'm now convinced that YOU APPROVE OTHER TYPES OF CRIMES, if they go
along with you AGENDA. You are despicable!
--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
You are covering up the subject, and also insult anyone's intelligence: I
wrote about this case as AN EXAMPLE.
Yes, and there are other ones known to many, like the Pons-Fleischmann
fiasco.

But let’s say there were 30 notable examples in the last century. Just to
suppose.

This STILL doesn’t mean that the choices are then a) the WHOLE FIELD is a
corrupt and there’s not a single product of the field that is trustable, or
b) there are HOLY PRACTICIONERS that make no mistake, are infallible and
intellectually unquestionable. The choices for human beings are not just
demons and gods. Why do you think it should be forced into that kind of
strawman discussion?
Post by Richard Hertz
It was the first one that appeared by googling "fraud in physics".
I had no intention to make a LIST, which I have no doubt that would
contain 20 cases with little effort searching.
But it WAS NOT my intention, and you are abusing of it with your WEAK and
FALLACIOUS rhetoric.
Do you the job. I have enough with Einstein, the evil crook.
--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Odd Bodkin
2021-11-19 21:32:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Richard Hertz
<snip>
Yes, and there are other ones known to many, like the Pons-Fleischmann fiasco.
But let’s say there were 30 notable examples in the last century. Just to suppose.
This STILL doesn’t mean that the choices are then a) the WHOLE FIELD is a
corrupt and there’s not a single product of the field that is trustable, or
b) there are HOLY PRACTICIONERS that make no mistake, are infallible and
intellectually unquestionable. The choices for human beings are not just
demons and gods. Why do you think it should be forced into that kind of
strawman discussion?
<snip>
Don't run away me with a variant of "strawman" argument. It means that you are "shilling".
Go back my center point, of which I started the OP here. Actually, I
initiated it just to troll, but now I'm serious about this discussion.
Note that I wrote the topic as "Fraud in physics". I didn't dare to post
"Fraud in science" or the thread would become endless.
I'm strongly convinced, after decades of knowing examples, that physics
in particular is CORRUPTED in any field of many.
And particularly, due to the STRONG PRESSURE of establishment and elite,
- General Relativity and Cosmology
- General Relativity and Astrophysics
- Special Relativity IN the efforts to PROVE IT RIGHT.
- Any subject on which Special Relativity NUMERICAL IMPACT can't be
dismissed for being small enough.
- Newtonian dynamics AND corrections due to classic perturbations are as
ACCURATE as institution can (depends on computer power).
- NASA/ESA affirmations concerning applied newtonian dynamics and
corrections (by approximations), to the degree of
the complexity of the numerical simulation and type of algorithms and computers used.
And regarding to the FRAUD issue in physics, I'm convinced that, as times
- Outcomes of LHC and the like are COOKED and FUDGED as Hell. People want
to keep their job and privileges.
- Outcomes of LIGO and the like are ABSOLUTELY FALSE. Just find out HOW they "detect" GW.
- Outcomes of COBE, WMAP and PLANCK are PURE GARBAGE, cooked and fudged
in HIGHLY DEPARTMENTALIZED teamworks that,
in the case of PLANCK mission involved near 10,000 scientist from many
countries. Such teamwork has been disassembled entirely.
- Any attempt to relate atomic bombs to E=mc2 AND NOT to electrostatic
repulsion in the nuclei, is FALSE.
These are firm postures. And, as a crazy friend of mine used to say: "If
you don't like them, I have anothers".
FRAUD IS EVERYWHERE.
Science, politics, social issues, economy and finances, trading, science
(all of them), etc.
My understanding: Too many people getting universitary degrees, few jobs,
and the need to stand out in a crew of millions of persons
looking for a grasp on power, money and privileges. As simple as that.
--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Odd Bodkin
2021-11-19 21:54:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Richard Hertz
<snip>
Yes, and there are other ones known to many, like the Pons-Fleischmann fiasco.
But let’s say there were 30 notable examples in the last century. Just to suppose.
This STILL doesn’t mean that the choices are then a) the WHOLE FIELD is a
corrupt and there’s not a single product of the field that is trustable, or
b) there are HOLY PRACTICIONERS that make no mistake, are infallible and
intellectually unquestionable. The choices for human beings are not just
demons and gods. Why do you think it should be forced into that kind of
strawman discussion?
<snip>
Don't run away me with a variant of "strawman" argument. It means that you are "shilling".
Go back my center point, of which I started the OP here. Actually, I
initiated it just to troll, but now I'm serious about this discussion.
Note that I wrote the topic as "Fraud in physics". I didn't dare to post
"Fraud in science" or the thread would become endless.
I'm strongly convinced, after decades of knowing examples, that physics
in particular is CORRUPTED in any field of many.
And yet, what you are personally convinced of has absolutely no importance.
Presenting your case of a small number of fraudulent investigations does
nothing to demonstrate to anyone that physics is “in particular corrupted”.


You can become “convinced” of all sorts of unsupportable allegations, and
you can spew all sorts of propaganda about them over and over again, but it
will not make them true.

I’m aware that a fascist strategy is to distort truth and shamelessly lie,
and to do it over and over and over again, just to get the populace to
develop some doubts about what is true and what is not. The US has lived
that in recent years, and Germany and Italy lived it in the late 1930s and
early 1940s.

It is still despicable and baseless propaganda.

Nobody cares what you are convinced of.
Post by Richard Hertz
And particularly, due to the STRONG PRESSURE of establishment and elite,
- General Relativity and Cosmology
- General Relativity and Astrophysics
- Special Relativity IN the efforts to PROVE IT RIGHT.
- Any subject on which Special Relativity NUMERICAL IMPACT can't be
dismissed for being small enough.
- Newtonian dynamics AND corrections due to classic perturbations are as
ACCURATE as institution can (depends on computer power).
- NASA/ESA affirmations concerning applied newtonian dynamics and
corrections (by approximations), to the degree of
the complexity of the numerical simulation and type of algorithms and computers used.
And regarding to the FRAUD issue in physics, I'm convinced that, as times
- Outcomes of LHC and the like are COOKED and FUDGED as Hell. People want
to keep their job and privileges.
- Outcomes of LIGO and the like are ABSOLUTELY FALSE. Just find out HOW they "detect" GW.
- Outcomes of COBE, WMAP and PLANCK are PURE GARBAGE, cooked and fudged
in HIGHLY DEPARTMENTALIZED teamworks that,
in the case of PLANCK mission involved near 10,000 scientist from many
countries. Such teamwork has been disassembled entirely.
- Any attempt to relate atomic bombs to E=mc2 AND NOT to electrostatic
repulsion in the nuclei, is FALSE.
These are firm postures. And, as a crazy friend of mine used to say: "If
you don't like them, I have anothers".
FRAUD IS EVERYWHERE.
Science, politics, social issues, economy and finances, trading, science
(all of them), etc.
My understanding: Too many people getting universitary degrees, few jobs,
and the need to stand out in a crew of millions of persons
looking for a grasp on power, money and privileges. As simple as that.
--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Maciej Wozniak
2021-11-19 22:52:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Odd Bodkin
I’m aware that a fascist strategy is to distort truth and shamelessly lie,
and to do it over and over and over again, just to get the populace to
develop some doubts about what is true and what is not.
Of course you're aware. Your Shit has preceded it.
JanPB
2021-11-22 23:33:00 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Richard Hertz
<snip>
Yes, and there are other ones known to many, like the Pons-Fleischmann fiasco.
But let’s say there were 30 notable examples in the last century. Just to suppose.
This STILL doesn’t mean that the choices are then a) the WHOLE FIELD is a
corrupt and there’s not a single product of the field that is trustable, or
b) there are HOLY PRACTICIONERS that make no mistake, are infallible and
intellectually unquestionable. The choices for human beings are not just
demons and gods. Why do you think it should be forced into that kind of strawman discussion?
<snip>
Don't run away me with a variant of "strawman" argument. It means that you are "shilling".
Go back my center point, of which I started the OP here. Actually, I initiated it just to troll, but now I'm serious about this discussion.
Note that I wrote the topic as "Fraud in physics". I didn't dare to post "Fraud in science" or the thread would become endless.
I'm strongly convinced, after decades of knowing examples, that physics in particular is CORRUPTED in any field of many.
Your convictions on the subject are of no consequence. I recommend a different hobby for you.
This physics thing is a total waste of your nerves and time.

--
Jan
Maciej Wozniak
2021-11-19 17:02:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Odd Bodkin
Post by Richard Hertz
<snip>
Post by JanPB
Fascinating but irrelevant.
--
Jan
Only a relativity fanatic and also an imbecile can say that this proven
case of FRAUD AT HIGH LEVEL in modern physics
is IRRELEVANT!
Only a fanatic would insist that fraud and deception is so rampant a human
condition that a SINGLE CASE
Your Shit is not a single case, Bod. It's nothing but frauds.
JanPB
2021-11-22 23:29:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Richard Hertz
<snip>
Post by JanPB
Fascinating but irrelevant.
--
Jan
Only a relativity fanatic and also an imbecile can say that this proven case of FRAUD AT HIGH LEVEL in modern physics
is IRRELEVANT!
That's because there is no "FRAUD AT HIGH LEVEL in modern physics", it's just a little fantasy
designed to simply boost your ego.
Post by Richard Hertz
It was a case that has shown how the entire physics establishment in western countries is ROTTEN TO THE CORE,
No, it's just your little fantasy. True, there is some funny business going on but no more than in
any other domain of decent and basically honest human activity.

A hint: you won't get anywhere in your life by attempting to fantasise away your difficulties.
Either roll up your sleeves and face them, or prepare for the continuationof the failure.
Some people actually enjoy being inside prison walls and failures, you appear to be one of them.
It's not that uncommon.
Post by Richard Hertz
Thanks to SOB like you, CRIME PROGRESS.
You should be ASHAMED for denying the importance of this FRAUD.
I'm now convinced that YOU APPROVE OTHER TYPES OF CRIMES, if they go along with you AGENDA. You are despicable!
Stop fantasising. Your posts are 100% garbage.

--
Jan
Paul Alsing
2021-11-19 20:49:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Richard Hertz
<snip>
Post by Paul Alsing
What a load of crap! If you were a stock I would sell you short and make a fortune!
And who would borrow you the money in order to buy the stock, because you are not going to use your own, isn't it?
I see your short selling beforehand, because you are an idiot that can't hide traces, so I call a put action on the stock, then
I make public that I'm retiring and you are done. Kiss your assets goodbye.
I'll profit more than proving Einstein wrong, which is going to happen here any moment now.
Wait, it's coming.
I'll make the popcorn AND enjoy my profits... IF you were a stock!

You are only the most recent of a long line of kooks over the last 115 years who have claimed to prove Einstein wrong... and not a single one of you have succeeded, to date. You and the rest are all Quacks...

http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~siegel/quack.html
Maciej Wozniak
2021-11-19 21:21:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Paul Alsing
You are only the most recent of a long line of kooks over the last 115 years who have claimed to prove Einstein wrong... and not a single one of you have succeeded, to date.
In the meantime in the real world, however, forbidden by
your moronic religion GPS clocks keep measuring t'=t,
just like all serious clocks always did.
Richard Hertz
2021-11-19 23:50:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
To many relativists like:

******************************************************************************
Paul Alsing's, 19 Nov. 2021, 20:49 UTC

I'll make the popcorn AND enjoy my profits... IF you were a stock!

You are only the most recent of a long line of kooks over the last 115 years who have claimed to prove Einstein wrong... and not a single one of you have succeeded, to date. You and the rest are all Quacks...

http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~siegel/quack.html
******************************************************************************

and

******************************************************************************
***@gmail.com, 23:49 UTC

And yet, what you are personally convinced of has absolutely no importance.
Presenting your case of a small number of fraudulent investigations does
nothing to demonstrate to anyone that physics is “in particular corrupted”.

You can become “convinced” of all sorts of unsupportable allegations, and
you can spew all sorts of propaganda about them over and over again, but it
will not make them true.

I’m aware that a fascist strategy is to distort truth and shamelessly lie,
and to do it over and over and over again, just to get the populace to
develop some doubts about what is true and what is not. The US has lived that
in recent years, and Germany and Italy lived it in the late 1930s and early 1940s.

It is still despicable and baseless propaganda.

Nobody cares what you are convinced of.
******************************************************************************

Remember your posts making fun of me or, in particular case of Bodkin, making disgusting accusations to me.

Tomorrow I'll present here a mathematical development which ultimately proves that Einstein committed FRAUD in Nov. 1915.

The biggest HOAX in the history of physics (even of science), truly DESPICABLE, specially for the subsequent coverup.

YOU will have to EAT YOUR ACCUSATIONS AND TEASING, because the paper that made him a WORLDWIDE CELEBRITY, is FALSE.
It was cooked, fudged, hacked, plagiarized, etc. The whole package.

You might have two choices:

1) Read and ACCEPT the FRAUD(S), and rethink your conception of physics regarding General Relativity.

2) Ignore and dismiss the MATHEMATICAL PROOFS, to keep the blind faith that make you worship the charlatan.

I'll don't care about your choice. I'm OK with having reached an ultimate proof about Einstein being a corrupt fraudster.

There are many others fraudsters, but Einstein is the icon of science, and he never deserved such status.
Paul Alsing
2021-11-20 00:05:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Richard Hertz
******************************************************************************
Paul Alsing's, 19 Nov. 2021, 20:49 UTC
I'll make the popcorn AND enjoy my profits... IF you were a stock!
You are only the most recent of a long line of kooks over the last 115 years who have claimed to prove Einstein wrong... and not a single one of you have succeeded, to date. You and the rest are all Quacks...
http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~siegel/quack.html
******************************************************************************
and
******************************************************************************
And yet, what you are personally convinced of has absolutely no importance.
Presenting your case of a small number of fraudulent investigations does
nothing to demonstrate to anyone that physics is “in particular corrupted”.
You can become “convinced” of all sorts of unsupportable allegations, and
you can spew all sorts of propaganda about them over and over again, but it
will not make them true.
I’m aware that a fascist strategy is to distort truth and shamelessly lie,
and to do it over and over and over again, just to get the populace to
develop some doubts about what is true and what is not. The US has lived that
in recent years, and Germany and Italy lived it in the late 1930s and early 1940s.
It is still despicable and baseless propaganda.
Nobody cares what you are convinced of.
******************************************************************************
Remember your posts making fun of me or, in particular case of Bodkin, making disgusting accusations to me.
Tomorrow I'll present here a mathematical development which ultimately proves that Einstein committed FRAUD in Nov. 1915.
The biggest HOAX in the history of physics (even of science), truly DESPICABLE, specially for the subsequent coverup.
YOU will have to EAT YOUR ACCUSATIONS AND TEASING, because the paper that made him a WORLDWIDE CELEBRITY, is FALSE.
It was cooked, fudged, hacked, plagiarized, etc. The whole package.
1) Read and ACCEPT the FRAUD(S), and rethink your conception of physics regarding General Relativity.
2) Ignore and dismiss the MATHEMATICAL PROOFS, to keep the blind faith that make you worship the charlatan.
I'll don't care about your choice. I'm OK with having reached an ultimate proof about Einstein being a corrupt fraudster.
There are many others fraudsters, but Einstein is the icon of science, and he never deserved such status.
YAWN...

https://skepticalteacher.wordpress.com/2009/05/19/more-physics-woo-the-einstein-cranks/

"It could very well be that, in the end, Einstein is wrong and that relativity theory will eventually be relegated to the dustbin of scientific history. But it is going to take more than the wild-eyed insistence on the part of pseudoscientists on the Internet to topple relativity. If anything will topple Einstein’s theory, it is going to be from within science, due to a careful application of the same thinking which led to the very paradigm shift he championed."

I suspect that your alethophobia is completely incurable, and your constant tirades are wearing thin. The bigger they are, the harder they fall... look out below!
Richard Hertz
2021-11-20 00:14:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Paul Alsing
Post by Richard Hertz
******************************************************************************
Paul Alsing's, 19 Nov. 2021, 20:49 UTC
I'll make the popcorn AND enjoy my profits... IF you were a stock!
You are only the most recent of a long line of kooks over the last 115 years who have claimed to prove Einstein wrong... and not a single one of you have succeeded, to date. You and the rest are all Quacks...
http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~siegel/quack.html
******************************************************************************
and
******************************************************************************
And yet, what you are personally convinced of has absolutely no importance.
Presenting your case of a small number of fraudulent investigations does
nothing to demonstrate to anyone that physics is “in particular corrupted”.
You can become “convinced” of all sorts of unsupportable allegations, and
you can spew all sorts of propaganda about them over and over again, but it
will not make them true.
I’m aware that a fascist strategy is to distort truth and shamelessly lie,
and to do it over and over and over again, just to get the populace to
develop some doubts about what is true and what is not. The US has lived that
in recent years, and Germany and Italy lived it in the late 1930s and early 1940s.
It is still despicable and baseless propaganda.
Nobody cares what you are convinced of.
******************************************************************************
Remember your posts making fun of me or, in particular case of Bodkin, making disgusting accusations to me.
Tomorrow I'll present here a mathematical development which ultimately proves that Einstein committed FRAUD in Nov. 1915.
The biggest HOAX in the history of physics (even of science), truly DESPICABLE, specially for the subsequent coverup.
YOU will have to EAT YOUR ACCUSATIONS AND TEASING, because the paper that made him a WORLDWIDE CELEBRITY, is FALSE.
It was cooked, fudged, hacked, plagiarized, etc. The whole package.
1) Read and ACCEPT the FRAUD(S), and rethink your conception of physics regarding General Relativity.
2) Ignore and dismiss the MATHEMATICAL PROOFS, to keep the blind faith that make you worship the charlatan.
I'll don't care about your choice. I'm OK with having reached an ultimate proof about Einstein being a corrupt fraudster.
There are many others fraudsters, but Einstein is the icon of science, and he never deserved such status.
YAWN...
https://skepticalteacher.wordpress.com/2009/05/19/more-physics-woo-the-einstein-cranks/
"It could very well be that, in the end, Einstein is wrong and that relativity theory will eventually be relegated to the dustbin of scientific history. But it is going to take more than the wild-eyed insistence on the part of pseudoscientists on the Internet to topple relativity. If anything will topple Einstein’s theory, it is going to be from within science, due to a careful application of the same thinking which led to the very paradigm shift he championed."
I suspect that your alethophobia is completely incurable, and your constant tirades are wearing thin. The bigger they are, the harder they fall... look out below!
Alethophobia: The inability to accept unflattering facts about your nation, religion, culture, ethnic group, or yourself.

Running out of insults, Paul?
Paul Alsing
2021-11-20 01:30:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Richard Hertz
Post by Paul Alsing
Post by Richard Hertz
******************************************************************************
Paul Alsing's, 19 Nov. 2021, 20:49 UTC
I'll make the popcorn AND enjoy my profits... IF you were a stock!
You are only the most recent of a long line of kooks over the last 115 years who have claimed to prove Einstein wrong... and not a single one of you have succeeded, to date. You and the rest are all Quacks...
http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~siegel/quack.html
******************************************************************************
and
******************************************************************************
And yet, what you are personally convinced of has absolutely no importance.
Presenting your case of a small number of fraudulent investigations does
nothing to demonstrate to anyone that physics is “in particular corrupted”.
You can become “convinced” of all sorts of unsupportable allegations, and
you can spew all sorts of propaganda about them over and over again, but it
will not make them true.
I’m aware that a fascist strategy is to distort truth and shamelessly lie,
and to do it over and over and over again, just to get the populace to
develop some doubts about what is true and what is not. The US has lived that
in recent years, and Germany and Italy lived it in the late 1930s and early 1940s.
It is still despicable and baseless propaganda.
Nobody cares what you are convinced of.
******************************************************************************
Remember your posts making fun of me or, in particular case of Bodkin, making disgusting accusations to me.
Tomorrow I'll present here a mathematical development which ultimately proves that Einstein committed FRAUD in Nov. 1915.
The biggest HOAX in the history of physics (even of science), truly DESPICABLE, specially for the subsequent coverup.
YOU will have to EAT YOUR ACCUSATIONS AND TEASING, because the paper that made him a WORLDWIDE CELEBRITY, is FALSE.
It was cooked, fudged, hacked, plagiarized, etc. The whole package.
1) Read and ACCEPT the FRAUD(S), and rethink your conception of physics regarding General Relativity.
2) Ignore and dismiss the MATHEMATICAL PROOFS, to keep the blind faith that make you worship the charlatan.
I'll don't care about your choice. I'm OK with having reached an ultimate proof about Einstein being a corrupt fraudster.
There are many others fraudsters, but Einstein is the icon of science, and he never deserved such status.
YAWN...
https://skepticalteacher.wordpress.com/2009/05/19/more-physics-woo-the-einstein-cranks/
"It could very well be that, in the end, Einstein is wrong and that relativity theory will eventually be relegated to the dustbin of scientific history. But it is going to take more than the wild-eyed insistence on the part of pseudoscientists on the Internet to topple relativity. If anything will topple Einstein’s theory, it is going to be from within science, due to a careful application of the same thinking which led to the very paradigm shift he championed."
I suspect that your alethophobia is completely incurable, and your constant tirades are wearing thin. The bigger they are, the harder they fall... look out below!
Alethophobia: The inability to accept unflattering facts about your nation, religion, culture, ethnic group, or yourself.
Running out of insults, Paul?
You are showing yourself to be the fraud here since you conveniently failed to present the *other* definition, the one listed first in every dictionary, that one I intended for you...

alethophobia, noun - A crippling fear of truth.

"...when you're trying to build a house of cards, the last thing you should do is blow hard and wave your hands like a madman."
- Rupert Goodwins
Paparios
2021-11-20 00:26:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Richard Hertz
******************************************************************************
Remember your posts making fun of me or, in particular case of Bodkin, making disgusting accusations to me.
Tomorrow I'll present here a mathematical development which ultimately proves that Einstein committed FRAUD in Nov. 1915.
Nobody cares about what you, in your delusional thinking about Einstein works, can show. Einstein legacy, like Galileo's and Newton's, is here and will remain here for the centuries to come.

Find another hobby, most probably far away from physics.
Richard Hertz
2021-11-20 00:51:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Paparios
Post by Richard Hertz
******************************************************************************
Remember your posts making fun of me or, in particular case of Bodkin, making disgusting accusations to me.
Tomorrow I'll present here a mathematical development which ultimately proves that Einstein committed FRAUD in Nov. 1915.
Nobody cares about what you, in your delusional thinking about Einstein works, can show. Einstein legacy, like Galileo's and Newton's, is here and will remain here for the centuries to come.
Find another hobby, most probably far away from physics.
Another idiot that will have to eat his words. Save and print this post.
Dono.
2021-11-20 00:33:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Richard Hertz
Tomorrow I'll present here a mathematical development
Delusions, delusions. You are off your meds again.
Richard Hertz
2021-11-20 00:51:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Dono.
Post by Richard Hertz
Tomorrow I'll present here a mathematical development
Delusions, delusions. You are off your meds again.
Another idiot that will have to eat his words. Save and print this post.
Richard Hertz
2021-11-20 00:52:25 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Dono.
Post by Richard Hertz
Tomorrow I'll present here a mathematical development
Delusions, delusions. You are off your meds again.
Another idiot that will have to eat his words. Save and print this post.
Richard Hertz
2021-11-20 00:54:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Friday, November 19, 2021 at 9:33:50 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:

<snip>
Post by Dono.
Delusions, delusions. You are off your meds again.
Another idiot that will have to eat his words. Save and print this post.
Michael Moroney
2021-11-20 02:49:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Richard Hertz
Tomorrow I'll present here a mathematical development which ultimately proves that Einstein committed FRAUD in Nov. 1915.
The biggest HOAX in the history of physics (even of science), truly DESPICABLE, specially for the subsequent coverup.
YOU will have to EAT YOUR ACCUSATIONS AND TEASING, because the paper that made him a WORLDWIDE CELEBRITY, is FALSE.
It was cooked, fudged, hacked, plagiarized, etc. The whole package.
1) Read and ACCEPT the FRAUD(S), and rethink your conception of physics regarding General Relativity.
2) Ignore and dismiss the MATHEMATICAL PROOFS, to keep the blind faith that make you worship the charlatan.
You forgot:
3) Laugh at the rambling misinterpretation of historical events (or
made-up "facts") that you've written or found somewhere. Which will be a
"proof" about as believable as a proof that the sun rises in the west.
Post by Richard Hertz
I'll don't care about your choice. I'm OK with having reached an ultimate proof about Einstein being a corrupt fraudster.
There are many others fraudsters, but Einstein is the icon of science, and he never deserved such status.
Odd Bodkin
2021-11-20 02:59:00 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Michael Moroney
Post by Richard Hertz
Tomorrow I'll present here a mathematical development which ultimately
proves that Einstein committed FRAUD in Nov. 1915.
The biggest HOAX in the history of physics (even of science), truly
DESPICABLE, specially for the subsequent coverup.
YOU will have to EAT YOUR ACCUSATIONS AND TEASING, because the paper
that made him a WORLDWIDE CELEBRITY, is FALSE.
It was cooked, fudged, hacked, plagiarized, etc. The whole package.
1) Read and ACCEPT the FRAUD(S), and rethink your conception of physics
regarding General Relativity.
2) Ignore and dismiss the MATHEMATICAL PROOFS, to keep the blind faith
that make you worship the charlatan.
3) Laugh at the rambling misinterpretation of historical events (or
made-up "facts") that you've written or found somewhere. Which will be a
"proof" about as believable as a proof that the sun rises in the west.
Post by Richard Hertz
I'll don't care about your choice. I'm OK with having reached an
ultimate proof about Einstein being a corrupt fraudster.
There are many others fraudsters, but Einstein is the icon of science,
and he never deserved such status.
I think the crux of Richard’s bogus “proof” will be missing steps in the
explication, which he will then claim as proof that he was stuck and
couldn’t possibly have gotten from A to G since F was not explicitly shown
and therefore he must have stolen it. It’s pathetic, really.
--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Richard Hertz
2021-11-20 03:19:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Friday, November 19, 2021 at 11:59:03 PM UTC-3, ***@gmail.com wrote:

<snip>
Post by Odd Bodkin
I think the crux of Richard’s bogus “proof” will be missing steps in the
explication, which he will then claim as proof that he was stuck and
couldn’t possibly have gotten from A to G since F was not explicitly shown
and therefore he must have stolen it. It’s pathetic, really.
You too will have to ate your words, Bodkin.

Print this post and have it at hand.

We'll see if you keep thinking about bogus "proof" or missing steps, mathematician.

You'll have the chance to honor your degree, validating it.
Richard Hertz
2021-11-20 03:21:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Friday, November 19, 2021 at 11:49:16 PM UTC-3, Michael Moroney wrote:

<snip>
Post by Michael Moroney
3) Laugh at the rambling misinterpretation of historical events (or
made-up "facts") that you've written or found somewhere. Which will be a
"proof" about as believable as a proof that the sun rises in the west.
Another one that will have to eat every word written above.

Print this post and have ketchup and mustard at hand, Moroney.
Paul Alsing
2021-11-20 06:29:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Richard Hertz
There are many others fraudsters, but Einstein is the icon of science,
and he never deserved such status.
Thomas Heger complains here that the 1905 paper should be rejected because
it isn’t perfect, where by perfect he means jumping through all the hoops
that Thomas would have preferred to see, including a table of variables.
His claim is that if Einstein is to be revered there should be no possible
cause for any complaints about any aspect of his work. It’s silly, of
course.
And here you are doing the same. Putting him up on a pedestal tall enough
to make it easy to topple it over.
Thomas is a loon. You wanna be like him?
Too late, the jury has already returned...
Richard Hertz
2021-11-20 00:58:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Dono, 02:33 UTC

Hertz: > Tomorrow I'll present here a mathematical development

Delusions, delusions. You are off your meds again.

Dono, save and print this post. You'll have to eat it soon.
Dono.
2021-11-20 01:25:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Richard Hertz
Dono, 02:33 UTC
Hertz: > Tomorrow I'll present here a mathematical development
Delusions, delusions. You are off your meds again.
I'll have to eat some more shit soon.
Yes, you will
Loading...