The Starmaker wrote:
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > J. Clarke wrote:
> > > >
> > > > In article <***@bt.com>, platinum198
> > > > @pants.btinternet.com says...
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> There appears to me..
> > > > > >> that there are two types
> > > > > >> of Science.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> One is United Kingdom Science, and
> > > > > >> the other is United States Science.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I'm trying to figure out
> > > > > >> which one is superior.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The UK guys are a strange lot...youuknowwatimean?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You got the UK Hoyle guy
> > > > > > who came up with
> > > > > > the word
> > > > > > The Big Bang
> > > > > > but never believed in it.
> > > > >
> > > > > The phrase was intended to heap scorn on the idea. That was at a time when
> > > > > his competing idea stood a slight chance of being right. Later observations
> > > > > killed it off.
> > > > >
> > > > > But the point was that the two models made predictions about what should be
> > > > > observed. Both said we should see an expansion (a Hubble constant) but only
> > > > > one said we should see a nearly uniform black body radiation of a few
> > > > > Kelvins, and only one predicted the observed ratio of H and He in the
> > > > > universe.
> > > >
> > > > In any case the Big Bang is not "United States science", the guy who
> > > > figured it out was a Belgian working for the Vatican. The US just found
> > > > the data that confirmed it, and that by dumb luck.
> > >
> > > And the Belgian guy working for the Vatican got confused with Albert Eienstein's big bang...the atomic bomb.
> > >
> > > ...the Belgian guy working for the Vatican
> > > was reading Albert Einstein's white paper...
> > > and thought The Atomic Bomb was some
> > > sort of Big Bang in the universe...
> > > but it was just a bomb that made the big bang.
> > >
> > > It's alllll soooooo confusing.
> > >
> > > Wat a mess!
> > >
> > > "that extremely powerful bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A single bomb of this
> > >
> > > type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy
> > >
> > > the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory." ---The real Big Bang
> > >
> > > I can understand people looking at Einstein's notes and saying to themselves...THIS IS A BIG BANG!!!!
> > >
> > > But it had nothing to do with the universe...he just wanted to kill some Germans.
> > >
> > > Somebody [whispered] 'a big bang' to another physicst, and they confused it with...a big bang!
> > >
> > > Albert Einstein went crazy wondering who told them about his 'extremely powerful bombs of a new type', thinking they
> > > knew about his atomic bomb secrets....
> > >
> > > It's alllll soooooo confusing.
> > >
> > > And it goes on to this day...
> > >
> > > Am I the only one who makes any sense here?
> > >
> > > What Well are you all drinking from?
> > >
> > > The Starmaker
> >
> > I mean..
> > haven't you figured this out yet????
> >
> > That, that ..
> >
> > The origins of the big bang
> > The origins of the atomic bomb
> > are both the same?
> >
> > They are both the same thing!
> >
> > They both come from the same thing.
> >
> > They are one and the same thing.
> >
> > A large amount of energy released from a small amount of matter=TheAtomicBombisTheBigBang.
> >
> > The Big Bang is the Atomic Bomb.
> > TheAtomicBombisTheBigBang
> >
> > They are both the same thing.
> >
> > They both come from the theory of relativity.
> >
> > They both come from einstein.
> >
> > Somewhere...somehow
> >
> > yous people managed to
> > separate the two.
> >
> > A large amount of energy released from a small amount of matter= The Atomic Bang. or...The Big Bomb.
> >
> > How did History separate the two? I think it's called...Stupdity.
> >
> > The Starmaker
> >
> > You people made a Science out of Stupidity!
>
> In otherwords...somebody in the UK
> stole einstein's notes
> to see what
> he was thinking of.
>
> His atomic bomb notes were mistaken for
> a big bang in the universe.
Most people are not aware of this fact...(I mean *all* of yous)
that when Einstein discovered that somebody had to be reading his
atomic bomb notes and confusing it with explosions in the universe instead..
he quickly changed his theory of relativity paper to remove any indication
of a universe exploding. He fudge it.
fudge;
present or deal with (something) in a vague, noncommittal, or inadequate way, esp. so as to conceal the truth or mislead.
This is a true story.
The Starmaker